IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] draft-ietf-acme

Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org> Wed, 12 August 2015 18:24 UTC

Return-Path: <jsha@eff.org>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675FB1AC416 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:24:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.012
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ylVZjN8gkBpd for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.eff.org (mail2.eff.org [173.239.79.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9BEF1AC428 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eff.org; s=mail2; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=HgVxLef9NVJU7BfLp3gBHoAEn6uo1mGbaIDuF672bJ8=; b=WxMDQ0jT04RIO8iSzd5c0EAboaK/kGZM4wsuFs0mhnkrs82Zici8Q2GctqayIDhEUoSpbkrfu6WVgsg3DNG8seT5tj2sYnTiBWYv3o82azp7r6RO3kDZ2vC3ZkIJ/PJjStVT5nPpBGMfx1dw06B9QuCNUK8wnX+6SjR4vG66PHM=;
Received: ; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:22:57 -0700
Message-ID: <55CB8EFF.8060806@eff.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:22:55 -0700
From: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMAF4r_oj31gz6u9mQPSLrrPxS-e2Fpwj0mFJR=qa1xkgQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHOTMVLuO_Qa+psGk7r0nxd6Fj-Rx=ho2H0Lp_wrsTkeiYGeeg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXSi623tNMTcWXFeGm48bbJTPG_3Epi_kKxUYBppAfc3g@mail.gmail.com> <CAHOTMVKi=+zQvno+LNmJD=1=vYO3N-8_+GOeJLdgeqi+XJ5wbg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHOTMVKi=+zQvno+LNmJD=1=vYO3N-8_+GOeJLdgeqi+XJ5wbg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/gfBEsTnTAWl5zMW5y3Io124h8IU>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] draft-ietf-acme
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 18:24:43 -0000

I agree with Tony here. I'm not familiar with IETF processes, but I
assume adopting something even as a working draft conveys some
preliminary notion of acceptance. Is that correct? If so, we should aim
to fix this large outstanding bug before adopting the current draft.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email