Re: [Acme] IETF 107; agenda

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 10 March 2020 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B613A0BB5 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ezlKZ4JlJPv4 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x333.google.com (mail-wm1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EA6A3A0B6D for <acme@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x333.google.com with SMTP id 11so2553001wmo.2 for <acme@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=7yKjTVybiCqx7XELKSnJQxa4i4I98qnO34ViJXkEfKg=; b=u72sYgU8ibMCLM8g1P5an/YWUvhUh9cxjoiFT4rNuhHnBlQYcsbRCJjCNw7JZEZus1 8W9H8uPBIQBsMsEFR1g2+bsxBPE51CPFqyi2n1keGK29lHN6kM7ewhY7X3Bg1Mrw3ERE 9OjH3TtMB3EsZyXv7qLxC9CXXu50r/tgqefB0BOXdlLjNJVxHhTzqBp3HifilYmIxJ4f 28tkKbjXbeN0DR0xxcw3miVvIOl7XQs7WitowVFP/ubGkeJwfQwVakWC2I9u90KaVcK4 HAxJ8AeyA5ZyPfrmzNhRmddKA+tuk2zJFFkaHdy7/bv50VxCwF0gNmMqKbEVbtkCec6Q UK+Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=7yKjTVybiCqx7XELKSnJQxa4i4I98qnO34ViJXkEfKg=; b=NLD13tXgtsPu1qdDHOvJCBkXdxnxl1Wk0ra9Uk6ujcGl8nm7KZtxYntGJYitk0WjCD wOoBPsxDB2SIjnNKHxYEwPIIurPMvUtoyJHVLOCUF3kb6LC5ePoQl54cXIY0qkH+A0DV 7J0yrVh9irdIHQkIvoWxiDsrEjSY0PMQlsYC7UDJdyua3+ZF3y3B7LrcooPnQBovCcHU G7YMA5EIARp6H4FgoNuns0sl27FwLWYT58qa2/1hANUr7wdTbWqvNwZncQip+cO/sdk+ BnRjuNwQlTOFZKi9G8nENeJifxDCXDlteGFNhF+dSGUDQy5Boa7GqIrazmkb2YLKlqqC AlEQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2MQBtiuFRb7doKOg1PIzd9HikF1t+FLAh18MwDI4CHrXC26TOJ WhKxD8ZiEjj7UMxC6DHUuMgvfY0R6sE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: =?utf-8?q?ADFU+vuycfT/OLKS5Iaqxs/mYJ5lF//txuQsBaQTAwOH?= =?utf-8?q?LhFTTDU77I/qLSUZL6dGalBgfpHUA8An5Q=3D=3D?=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:218d:: with SMTP id e13mr3848707wme.127.1583871891009; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.12] ([46.120.57.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98sm6296610wrm.64.2020.03.10.13.24.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <F0EE54B2-7F42-4B34-B10D-582E16A89BCC@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1DB767E5-A9E4-4F4A-B6D5-9E882D3E9BC9"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 22:24:48 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAHBDyN6eT40ZD7FnESX+1ZTQeTuHHg+_836J5_f-y2QBTY8yng@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
References: <2737DD9A-53F6-4F03-AD30-0FC582E32501@akamai.com> <F7DD2447-6B9D-4B06-9F98-7734259D9866@gmail.com> <CAHBDyN6eT40ZD7FnESX+1ZTQeTuHHg+_836J5_f-y2QBTY8yng@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/gvn3m9_kVnWYZwcRH2qqpVPv920>
Subject: Re: [Acme] IETF 107; agenda
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:24:54 -0000

The IESG are considering the options and will let us know. The intent is still to have a week of virtual meetings.

After that ACME can decide if we’re participating in that, or making our own virtual interim a few weeks later.

> On 10 Mar 2020, at 22:21, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> So, I thought it was a possibility to have the week consist of all virtual meetings.  Or has that been totally removed from the table?  Some of us like that option as we've already blocked that week in our calendars.  
> 
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 3:07 PM Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:ynir.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> > On 9 Mar 2020, at 17:11, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
> > 
> > Yaron and I cannot attend and will be remote.  We have volunteers to act as chairs for us (on CC).  Looking at the list below, it seems reasonable to cancel our session.  PLEASE POST IF YOU DISAGREE.  Of course "they" may decide to cancel anyway, but please post your opinion here.
> 
> As it turns out, this decision has been made for us, as the entire meeting has been cancelled.
> 
> We will discuss on this list whether, when, and in what format we are planning on having a virtual meeting to replace the physical one.
> 
> See you all around, physically or virtually
> 
> Rich and Yoav
>