IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 13 May 2015 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E9E1A89AA for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2015 12:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.611
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F8-zVzvHow9X for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2015 12:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com [72.246.2.115]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5B11A8885 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 May 2015 12:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5DF47EBA; Wed, 13 May 2015 19:53:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com [172.17.121.112]) by prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B86847EB9; Wed, 13 May 2015 19:53:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (ustx2ex-cas2.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.25.31]) by prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F3F800CF; Wed, 13 May 2015 19:53:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.104) by ustx2ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Wed, 13 May 2015 14:53:17 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.134]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.134]) with mapi id 15.00.1076.000; Wed, 13 May 2015 14:53:17 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language
Thread-Index: AQHQe34a4GgjPor2uU27hdlsHinWgp1WTZyAgAADz4CAAAJrAIAAAYiAgAgdF4CAAAQYAIAAF/4AgBrFOwCAASHGS4AAAEtQ
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 19:53:16 +0000
Message-ID: <2dc5d20a27664efe994398ec508f0e7e@ustx2ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <6A9C3116-8CC9-472C-8AA8-F555D060834C@vigilsec.com> <55351EAB.1060905@cs.tcd.ie> <E81896AA-245F-48B7-9B38-86AC30D2F82A@vigilsec.com> <553523E4.2090808@cs.tcd.ie> <84718B26-1DA3-4D46-8B6F-B615806229D7@vigilsec.com> <CABcZeBOy2yBEMGMxcDy=E3fvc+OF1sZfvOV7twJHAvKqtrxtLg@mail.gmail.com> <28919F11-9336-41F6-9922-4E3E2DC4E935@gmail.com> <BD7B96B1-CD50-408F-AA06-49C20AB102A6@vigilsec.com> <CA+9kkMAH+U25ZhLq1HhGFHKMAECu+Y1ZJH-h4bOrEXaUQ15LjQ@mail.gmail.com> <87d225qwbq.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <B30EDBDF-0803-4AB0-9EBB-DD726F617C5B@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <B30EDBDF-0803-4AB0-9EBB-DD726F617C5B@vigilsec.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.32.175]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/iIxooDdJe4IM6e6r1VilZtNZayY>
Cc: IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Proposed ACME Charter Language
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 19:53:21 -0000

 
> The ACME working group is specifying ways to automate certificate issuance,
> validation, revocation and renewal.  The ACME working group is not
> reviewing or producing certificate policies or practices.

+1  A nice clean statement of what is not in scope.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email