Re: [Acme] Editorial fixes in GitHub
Niklas Keller <me@kelunik.com> Wed, 25 January 2017 16:28 UTC
Return-Path: <me@kelunik.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7A0129A22 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:28:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kelunik.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pddeiIwx_ETB for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:28:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5300::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B2C9129A2C for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:28:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1485361716; l=1397; s=domk; d=kelunik.com; h=Content-Type:Cc:To:Subject:Date:From:References:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version; bh=bR9gH7r0nJ+dpM+B/5D9afz1SuJUx7sld0MP6vG0RkQ=; b=VwmPcr/D+vh4SG+tIQFyHtzjlpro3aqRqkL0G98+ymo0Czy839rLhNsH5sIfh9GxvU 59ew2fxBjUHD9cvdtIrb6KXVLW+fYSMoM3zL7Xtp3ST5m3OtGLCwPI3U1lWfQ6YuBLTV 2JZGkT9gqcGBrELWWlkMvVay8wIm4Ll4lVgPI=
X-RZG-AUTH: :IWkkfkWkbvHsXQGmRYmUo9mls2vWuiu+7SLDup6E67mzuoNJBqD/tMc=
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00
Received: from mail-qt0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 39.11 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id N06c98t0PGSZZVK (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (curve secp384r1 with 384 ECDH bits, eq. 7680 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate) for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:28:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-qt0-f174.google.com with SMTP id l7so25207194qtd.1 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:28:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIV1Cgw0UeSTqjX+QlV3o9QNBqqtMMXmRooALzDEskI3KOkZPBY9qhXPLBA66ANPR5hfyrYFrC+zwPVfA==
X-Received: by 10.233.237.136 with SMTP id c130mr36961517qkg.160.1485361715164; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:28:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.144.132 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:28:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <31d94d1198ac4b1280e562430d0e1bb1@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <760b7647-3a28-efb8-9189-3ab9c50cfe5d@eff.org> <d197a9b6-a626-1ef9-5b40-f782cffe726a@eff.org> <31d94d1198ac4b1280e562430d0e1bb1@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
From: Niklas Keller <me@kelunik.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:28:34 +0100
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CANUQDCh5sL1KGrjPjS8FxCuTa365wid+1GEQsWAz-3AbtpF1uA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANUQDCh5sL1KGrjPjS8FxCuTa365wid+1GEQsWAz-3AbtpF1uA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c09830e6541b00546edb987"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/j0mwFUOJnBapnyT1UwsJevkAdt8>
Cc: "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Editorial fixes in GitHub
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 16:28:41 -0000
I already posted a comment on GitHub, but didn't get a response there, so I'm posting here again. > Standardize on new-account rather than new-acct; previously there was a mix. "authz" and "new-authz" seem to be the only abbreviated resources now. I guess we should change that one to new-authorization then? Feels inconsistent in the current way. https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/232#issuecomment-273894220 Regards, Niklas
- [Acme] Editorial fixes in GitHub Jacob Hoffman-Andrews
- Re: [Acme] Editorial fixes in GitHub Jacob Hoffman-Andrews
- Re: [Acme] Editorial fixes in GitHub Daniel McCarney
- Re: [Acme] Editorial fixes in GitHub Salz, Rich
- Re: [Acme] Editorial fixes in GitHub Josh Soref
- Re: [Acme] Editorial fixes in GitHub Niklas Keller
- Re: [Acme] Editorial fixes in GitHub Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [Acme] Editorial fixes in GitHub Jacob Hoffman-Andrews
- Re: [Acme] Editorial fixes in GitHub Roland Bracewell Shoemaker