IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] AD Review: draft-ietf-acme-caa-05

Hugo Landau <hlandau@devever.net> Sat, 29 December 2018 03:30 UTC

Return-Path: <hlandau@devever.net>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F93912872C for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Dec 2018 19:30:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=devever.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RlpPTzwMy2bD for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Dec 2018 19:30:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from umbriel.devever.net (umbriel.devever.net [149.202.51.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A908B127B4C for <acme@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Dec 2018 19:30:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by umbriel.devever.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3911C591; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 04:30:32 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=devever.net; h= user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:subject :from:from:date:date:received:received; s=mimas; t=1546054232; x=1564243593; bh=2iLh8hoDvFRhh9JGBCKWrtXa8AFUBKZcrUEvbA1+1kU=; b= VIknomEyu2iycGAPLVhmFicSlQ8doFs0COP736XAtr4Ug/qezUvykxYcRxC64Ggz VEb5jPe4SnyKo2dSWHIYld2xcBCJIXo/oDpss7EamXLvVdrhM6qpjiMQZQfZn4dm 42qrwHs37LOIA+9RWepKVr0aVJMggC4kDIG3diC7y+j2LwCCboKmCrVyvJxm9GZ4 4BMPF2c28+ntOkdxO6oQ6R+2DoxJXac4yvvu0q1QwRaAFs0HrsLLNyvV9mUWDdKQ 7svAuX+2RuD+PgHDf9BHJZn5NfmHvqqtOFgz4n2/ueDzk9oPw9Tr7ux9DBqf2C5P kq594wLFC8UXoJyC/pENqQ==
Received: from umbriel.devever.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (umbriel.devever.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id ocErEX15hKyD; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 04:30:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from axminster (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by umbriel.devever.net (Postfix) with SMTP id AA3BC1C386; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 04:30:32 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 03:30:32 +0000
From: Hugo Landau <hlandau@devever.net>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: acme@ietf.org, ekr@rtfm.com
Message-ID: <20181229033032.GA25199@axminster>
References: <CABcZeBMoHaDGEgQXmM2qdGi=i0mXxPsuKdiq3jtAKTojVOAG_A@mail.gmail.com> <20181204022641.GA29286@axminster> <CABcZeBOBSWysCEJXJ+rD6mG4=QgMyuo77giNm5NuWJKrxZMK1Q@mail.gmail.com> <20181222162816.GA23425@axminster> <CABcZeBOPs2AFMo8RYgoSP7zHOtNcoV0681e_r8yhTPdxgYhTCg@mail.gmail.com> <19FFB15F-3B01-49C7-A9BE-863BE159A40A@akamai.com> <20181229021131.GA25012@axminster> <45C0FFD1-D3EE-4B28-8062-520A9AC13456@akamai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <45C0FFD1-D3EE-4B28-8062-520A9AC13456@akamai.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/jdPerYAbD-DcS1P88P5n3qcJZyE>
Subject: Re: [Acme] AD Review: draft-ietf-acme-caa-05
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 03:30:38 -0000

On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 03:23:35AM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote:
> 
>     +   Validation methods beginning with the prefix "ca-" are reserved for CA-local
>     +   meaning and may not be registered.
> 
> "need not be" ?  Or "SHOULD NOT be" ?
My intention was that the rules of the registry state that such names
MUST NOT be registered. I didn't use a capitalised keyword here for
consistency with the prose already in that section.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email