[Acme] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme-ip-06
Tim Chown via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 22 July 2019 07:06 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: acme@ietf.org
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B02B9120105; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 00:06:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tim Chown via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-acme-ip.all@ietf.org, acme@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.99.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Tim Chown <tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <156377921561.28095.8769915775081360800@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 00:06:55 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/sD8sskiAQsIr4UuasVHFRbWz5d0>
Subject: [Acme] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme-ip-06
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 07:06:56 -0000
Reviewer: Tim Chown Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The draft defines the identifiers and challenges required to enable ACME to issue certificates for IP addresses. RFC8555 only defines challenges for DNS host names with identifier type "dns"; this document describes how challenges defined in the original ACME specification can be used to support validation of IPv4 and IPv6 addresses using identifier type "ip". The document also covers use of the TLS-ALPN challenge. The document is written clearly and ready to be advanced.
- [Acme] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme… Tim Chown via Datatracker