Re: [Acme] AD Review of draft-ietf-acme-email-smime-07

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Fri, 22 May 2020 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B973A0A65 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 08:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z5GQqZ-aHM6N for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 08:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85AA13A0997 for <acme@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2020 08:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04MF2cfu023403; Fri, 22 May 2020 16:03:01 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=UhZUYQf3jMiLtMPWmqJYZIJO1Zgnyg0Cdx56LhOIglg=; b=LNyvHqEVm3Hul6BgWQs9SkB2EmSepCmojaWzK7ZQe8s22Q2xiPaDDSKF13Ta+ZfFj//6 kHmWbrNLvIYbIEbDcO4H6+pYyZ+NoT/2nIUZZWnM9XYnbHcgOlghY101viXbVLx6ejJ2 OVKGxbp6hWTpHI3pc2gnzWrBIwawDztMe3VT+AlI5Hs0u06PHFWv+UOLtY5v73W2qrBV eYzuorMU/p22HotiGLp9557TKRS6TzeaaijOPQYJM6Tx24H9ZnztBGgFkAdv1YKnA8p3 AqhHL5qUmlXKq6vtgDdg6JnY0UEE5jkeeGkuwtXyoiojm8saEF7aRqILdjwCm84roa2q lg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint4 (a72-247-45-32.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.32] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3127eh9cqq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 22 May 2020 16:03:00 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 04MF2WJI019603; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:02:59 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.113]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com with ESMTP id 312bguvqqt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 22 May 2020 11:02:59 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) by ustx2ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 22 May 2020 10:02:58 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Fri, 22 May 2020 10:02:58 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Acme] AD Review of draft-ietf-acme-email-smime-07
Thread-Index: AQHWMEoUWvvb9T0xL0S3Ry/O1QLTcg==
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 15:02:58 +0000
Message-ID: <3554417D-911C-441F-A015-E264D75C20D2@akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.37.20051002
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.116.68]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <D3179F79DECFE74AAAF7D7E9F2C6D5E2@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-22_05:2020-05-22, 2020-05-22 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=718 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2004280000 definitions=main-2005220123
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-22_05:2020-05-22, 2020-05-22 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=721 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2005220122
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/t2xHcI1Vq1bMb5_ia2REmlwTpDY>
Subject: Re: [Acme] AD Review of draft-ietf-acme-email-smime-07
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 15:03:09 -0000

>    ** What was the thinking behind the document status being informational?

As opposed to what, standards-track?  The main thing was no commitment to implement.