Re: [Acme] is draft-ietf-acme-integrations-02.txt ready for WGLC?
"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Fri, 05 March 2021 22:21 UTC
Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9DC3A1043 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:21:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.248, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id thZSB0Von-v5 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:21:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE9023A1041 for <acme@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:21:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050095.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 125MEJlT031551; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 22:21:38 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=O+wWnf49TdzlqWDooF3UzgdYfmKwYCXHCs4viTilp+0=; b=OU+EB0ZUAT82UzacAWfIOoP8Q9S9h0IML0N//X0RjeHs+8hkB0NsnXASfgym2MparrGF sbHN+V6lbqeOD4wZTA3MpXKvAL1sOaIF75W9tKyuhkJWUX/si/MA5skiU+OO8t/oICvx 9llAYvDSBQ+qpO7P5ROxmkB7fPm6qGIzNUZeKHrpu/cggP26QIsVzm+SrkzV9oTxTHy+ mSv/xZ5lUJmQUERSq69s1XqFTRAy9Orcm5gLtRmOFKBg76k/1wHY0FpgV0sta8Irx2e5 yMFoyNgWqXqq25GwnJc4hCIwB4VOj9EVCzgNw1V3j29PHczN9OVX/bsgocH5sDRD69yp cg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18] (may be forged)) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 36yfb5v5t3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 05 Mar 2021 22:21:38 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 125MIviG011454; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 17:21:37 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.31]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 36yja4fnes-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 05 Mar 2021 17:21:37 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 17:21:36 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.012; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 17:21:36 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Acme] is draft-ietf-acme-integrations-02.txt ready for WGLC?
Thread-Index: AQHXEgw8kZvjB8YuxECjrG70Buhq5Kp197QA
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 22:21:35 +0000
Message-ID: <E937F669-8043-4475-9377-7CEB8EBE2D90@akamai.com>
References: <160570067796.7653.16983301730346379379@ietfa.amsl.com> <5c9b6714-6c49-6abe-a90d-65c991c91aac@sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <5c9b6714-6c49-6abe-a90d-65c991c91aac@sandelman.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.46.21021202
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <AAC236C6C8BB97438C626C91884A89A8@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-03-05_14:2021-03-03, 2021-03-05 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=536 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2103050113
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-03-05_14:2021-03-03, 2021-03-05 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=459 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2103050113
X-Agari-Authentication-Results: mx.akamai.com; spf=${SPFResult} (sender IP is 184.51.33.18) smtp.mailfrom=rsalz@akamai.com smtp.helo=prod-mail-ppoint1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/vwKavtkVYoSFtcI78_zAhLv5yEo>
Subject: Re: [Acme] is draft-ietf-acme-integrations-02.txt ready for WGLC?
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 22:21:41 -0000
> Hi WG,
back in November, we thought the document was ready for WGLC.
If it's not, we'd appreciate some feedback.
Well, looking at https://codimd.ietf.org/notes-ietf-109-acme# (which didn't make the proceedings, sorry) I see:
Integrations
Two open issues; Owen will start two threads on the list. Some discussion of whether “auto-RA” is good or not
Do the authors think this has been resolved?
- [Acme] I-D Action: draft-ietf-acme-integrations-0… internet-drafts
- [Acme] is draft-ietf-acme-integrations-02.txt rea… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Acme] is draft-ietf-acme-integrations-02.txt… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Acme] is draft-ietf-acme-integrations-02.txt… Michael Richardson