IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] draft-ietf-acme

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 12 August 2015 18:24 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9910C1AC413 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GmXOsTGBysla for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x232.google.com (mail-la0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89A2A1ACEC3 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by labd1 with SMTP id d1so13870290lab.1 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=srOoAN5vjEChNuRdiBvZEQ7ku3l3heA+s3fgWJjL70I=; b=ZyNqKKsEUdrbXMHWANVFpR5YZqY4yIWzLsfj0iyNa2PZaqYuM8JEnpkBEPC0hS+r7a DxPsjuqRXdmaDSqm68tlH1JNhD8iBmMbvdXL5ZZoeCs8pqDr2Fk1SpOUL2+8nrb45mW/ 3gloSpH44nCaAhzy1dKA/qDltXccH1GhAEFgVxv1SKmD8nk6z083J2chC3RIjUA4XuFP ss4I/1yiemHztNbFkLWemWzFkf9/A2Gs1fZrGs9fFLCQIOQeCAiDtnsDmbpRtR9eDCL+ /ASbApCUjvjCDJ/e6lJyfPAyFMgZR213BgxpIvMlO5wDA+yQwQZ2NK+QvRWdqnTelLDY Ir3w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.28.229 with SMTP id e5mr32869616lah.110.1439403764064; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.162.198 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHOTMVKi=+zQvno+LNmJD=1=vYO3N-8_+GOeJLdgeqi+XJ5wbg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMAF4r_oj31gz6u9mQPSLrrPxS-e2Fpwj0mFJR=qa1xkgQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHOTMVLuO_Qa+psGk7r0nxd6Fj-Rx=ho2H0Lp_wrsTkeiYGeeg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXSi623tNMTcWXFeGm48bbJTPG_3Epi_kKxUYBppAfc3g@mail.gmail.com> <CAHOTMVKi=+zQvno+LNmJD=1=vYO3N-8_+GOeJLdgeqi+XJ5wbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:22:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnW630sx-UgmM-xk1HFvRvyg=zZsHEJGoONqKCZbQ5H7BA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/wFschbJuljupu5BE8xF5wmGjVeM>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] draft-ietf-acme
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 18:24:15 -0000

On 12 August 2015 at 11:18, Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com> wrote:
> It represents a conceptual misuse of digital signatures, and seems to me
> like a very fundamental design flaw which is easily addressed. I'm confused
> why you don't want to address it before adopting the draft.

If we set a precondition on adoption that said "no open issues" or
maybe even "no open issues that I think are serious" we would never
ever adopt anything.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email