IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] Want client-defined callback port

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Thu, 23 April 2015 13:37 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3476B1B3085 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 06:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7SGlLl-4_xeW for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 06:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x233.google.com (mail-lb0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00AA71B3093 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 06:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbcga7 with SMTP id ga7so13387711lbc.1 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 06:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=U5b5WKB9u8yWb8GiyGj805Va3DfzCSmtZyCrpD0vWww=; b=WQpIieuLJad9o2Uk27IqsYYuiidv22Fcyr7/uMpBN59cA0Xm9k9esgurZFJKchMfRE 7iU8tiGeJXoiKav1PPevd8E4ZC5nRsASSrNvXVfdjG2VKulJYk9SfqVg4bil6V4WiTIC yMHhLX74cmFkFJAXQMHv5+q6Us5vCKCtlud6EDkXz4/IILBz5gWNJlOgkAHvTMureqed i/AJZ16pGqupg61mmMwc6W+sEue6Qi+ulqrB5uISCDY0+xwZDvQTDzHFN49Xy7YOk49Y Fph1QJ+UuLr5h4lKTy70FLnUekic57eR6p6rAjl7dPd7DHiIwa9wa5MhOALRkiZNuR/c 9lNQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.40.9 with SMTP id t9mr2550874lbk.55.1429796234527; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 06:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.203.163 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 06:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgReRXAu4QjvsDYYkJN-WKS2bZeWNtZK-AoVndTncMQvag@mail.gmail.com>
References: <352DA5FE-AC6F-49A7-8F9F-70A74889204F@apple.com> <CAK3OfOjey4bk02qC_jj2c0AzZ54qnP=KAJnG=mXnO6A5gZ4m9g@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgQ94ijVrCM9SStcodRW+XSG2w5Zwu3+ny8HriDBnxjdtg@mail.gmail.com> <FF21526F-BA8D-4F54-AAE3-047632706668@apple.com> <CAL02cgSDk0TNYusEkXA3onmqF7=kaAWhHjpW8WjbiqxgQMdQwQ@mail.gmail.com> <555F6C74-2416-4893-BDEA-A3C2E55A6D57@apple.com> <16985cf1c8c444c48d328fa766ec5ff8@usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com> <DE264105-7317-4343-BCEE-539A73D42544@apple.com> <CAL02cgTv5Zi4wP0gJPvcrty6N96pAaLRkCveyvMNfoyjQrrEyw@mail.gmail.com> <0609C348-A6D8-46D5-AF58-5BE69910D261@apple.com> <CAL02cgT_DPY-Bn9A=UtCx+g2FKHON-TXGCWfH-gL8rR4yEFHZg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMAqte7O0k0KVRLRaEOmJL-wK0ncoruv3yoqKBjZVnc99g@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVP4as97fXe7XTFpC=rw6ETdXY5s=1cRj1Xan1sgDsx3A@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwg5GiknSceb1Ocs=VxA1cZpmcrmZbPeXpgfAHbOC3CUcw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgReRXAu4QjvsDYYkJN-WKS2bZeWNtZK-AoVndTncMQvag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:37:14 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: SfrdLMip-LbD12A6GrOBmGR7Afg
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwi97VeE7j72oCXTeqEJWSQ=RTM3VH6hZ_GapbtZ9bmfwQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/y5P_g0M3X7Mbvqmvl6VklSw9kio>
Cc: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>, Bruce Gaya <gaya@apple.com>, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Want client-defined callback port
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:37:44 -0000

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker
> <phill@hallambaker.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think this discussion is getting way too deep into the weeds of
>> policy. That isn't a concern IETF has generally taken a definitive
>> stand on. If it had there would not have been the need to set up
>> CABForum outside IETF.
>>
>> As I see it the specification should allow:
>>
>> * A mechanism for the client to indicate the proof(s) of DNS control
>> it can provide.
>>
>> * A mechanism for the service to indicate the proof(s) of DNS control
>> it will accept.
>
>
> I thought that's what this thread was about :)

No, people were discussing the stuff that I said should be left to CABForum.

An IETF working group is temporary. They are not meant to be permanent
institutions.

Why beat ourselves up here deciding an issue that we can't decide here?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email