Re: [Add] IESG evaluation of draft-ietf-add-svcb-dns and draft-ietf-add-ddr / draft-ietf-add-dnr

["Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <[e-mail]>]

As you may have seen, all the pending DISCUSS points raised during the IESG evaluation have been cleared; i.e., the three I-Ds may be sent to the RFC editor *as soon as* I have received the ack from DNR and SVCB authors[1] that those I-Ds are ready to go (i.e., all applicable changes have been made).

FYI, I am about to take 10 days of vacations so do not expect a prompt action of mine. Sorry ;-)

Regards and enjoy your vacation (if applicable)

-éric

[1] Tommy Pauly has already confirmed for DDR-10

From: Add <[e-mail]> on behalf of "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke=[e-mail]>
Date: Monday, 8 August 2022 at 10:05
To: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Add] IESG evaluation of draft-ietf-add-svcb-dns and draft-ietf-add-ddr / draft-ietf-add-dnr

Dear ADD members,

As you have probably seen by now, draft-ietf-add-svcb-dns is ready to go to the RFC editor queue, but as the DDR & DNR I-Ds have a normative reference to it and have still a DISCUSS, I prefer to delay the approval of the SVCB document until the DDR & DNR can also be approved.

My reasoning is that *if* a revised DDR / DNR require a change in the SVCB, then there is still an opportunity to do minor changes in the SVCB document. The probability is low, but the delay is probably harmless[1]. Happy to change my point of view if the authors and the ADD WG think differently.

Regards

-éric

[1] now, if either DDR or DNR are delayed by more than 3 months, then let’s approve the SVCB.