IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Add] Firefox DoH behaviour

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Tue, 16 July 2019 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D7D120B1C for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 10:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jcfAw_D1-G8m for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 10:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (smtp.v6.rfc1035.com [IPv6:2001:4b10:100:7::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1607A120ABE for <add@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 10:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.10.206.14] (unknown [161.12.34.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E3FD2421249; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 17:35:40 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBP50XudcymGzTJP7XBZzBNw-SsVHFS07wJ++FxoHMHtNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 18:35:39 +0100
Cc: add@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A1B73CC9-0A06-4D7D-8AF0-041AE5719B60@rfc1035.com>
References: <CAChr6SwEUz9MrdRA0bnv9f-oNi0oUHkfRKjd9-o6jwhuckLXdw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFWeb9LNdT=EYVKTsYDxcBCQKoQFNShKotYtWujt4U9GA-V1mg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFWeb9+eWKSKY9O2JLn9-0+Zq7hrD48F-y+Y4T-iRaaF0vtdOA@mail.gmail.com> <A45F4F74-D6C1-435A-A52F-C2DEA82E2999@sky.uk> <CAFWeb9JVBj+Yehup5q4v9X-7XDY+02frd-04AQGL2HoSLON2qA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMY9q9vKGse1svzbvXF_dSHA+9q06j4ugDVCZP9VT1koQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sz5Rfz=UxOYuPguSvVK2HCX2ZoA1-FytW7+EOUxN8y46Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNB7ASu2U3ZMBZ+OOxEhbSnhDXwFN3Lsex1uzVSDv3R=Q@mail.gmail.com> <c9c83673-c12e-0093-3873-0f2c03155fa5@brokendns.net> <CABcZeBP50XudcymGzTJP7XBZzBNw-SsVHFS07wJ++FxoHMHtNw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/BdSC6JY8zuEWf07frbF3Q36Ef7g>
Subject: [Add] Firefox DoH behaviour
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 17:35:43 -0000


> On 16 Jul 2019, at 17:49, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> 
> Firefox will disable DoH entirely if an enterprise policy is in place but it
> doesn't otherwise configure DoH

Could you provide more clarification? How will Firefox know if an enterprise policy is in place or what that policy is? If Firefox "doesn't otherwise configure DoH", does that mean DoH will always be disabled by default unless the end user deliberately and intentionally switches it on? Would DNS/DoH filtering policies at say an ISP or coffee shop be considered as an enterprise policy?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email