Re: [Add] meeting hum: should the IETF take up this work?

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Tue, 23 July 2019 22:30 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2531612039B for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, LOTS_OF_MONEY=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VjEmta2cO8gg for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB5CE1202E2 for <add@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id i10so85252199iol.13 for <add@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Y+YI3/LBHwshHrQef4B97f9W04p5RGLdp/gArZw/qXk=; b=YXDmO4KkeQ7/bePFyZ/iTD4Rh7Rm9m3Z6/stvETHwLjS5kSq0nBMYb5JnM7HsUYYbd qnUZTDasrQSrnYUNAmymYoxHBBfZ0Om4YnzYk7pFogwGJZUysJpqIk6uNF173lMbZ2rt EcFNvxSPQlvuw2IeoeYLsoJYOx4/Wgjnu2KKe0dOl1TmS7ZGCCsFZcBucnWCxTxShIAG BddLnGn5JKzFx9Yo/H7iLCNsYsvTDHYcPBAFlXLsWa4RJUJcd2gLSmdaN5nBQCvY8Gx6 mfaWC8EcLX5Rk69PGzKRvz75NCV2b23E2VtlChztdYPJDGhRwLQdwSkv0lOnr+WBhY7s 2Qwg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Y+YI3/LBHwshHrQef4B97f9W04p5RGLdp/gArZw/qXk=; b=SHtW5BeH0bxQ1KykQ4qXKkokltEEZeLZp30doM+WY+6syaRo/2xRkTZLBzZmJcKCEp 9ycoTg/N0o5mV8wzR8tcsY7k0ffJxBpNaluEg55IRSB1l+xSH7Ffm2O1sSKI7asnY3ol JDkfvSbFPRFS9rGt+UWXgyP/wWfkAHjtD8w94tJk+7pj9AENgbF0MkV76t2jGmEUjz03 pSuPJajIr4oIyJaf/xx3XuzdcU9hquOjo0kL1sT8I3Cppy2QykfS26BWPFbZl/zyrU00 YRhSQMiqwgM1hz2n1/OpDeLKRhUpW+pOJEgMc+2++Akq/Kav7Yb/HxisPKTjyrYcsy6h tbLw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWFPWUpe4LPBhQAQ8m/DjGD1olaTkrxyQ9ToWEXy58/nUVgkZ/i +JsNrulI0Jj9pULj1fQ3AoJEygoG+cakRoYU/BMlA7mUy0g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz4ru2WflAwj86eRTtdMt8LxM0xKL9dp1D2QXbhoQGPw3WCKpbHn7P7mKPtdirZYAkp7xWOtnjxYyO2YAna9As=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:bc42:: with SMTP id m63mr58460822iof.189.1563921021919; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6Sx9TEt6CMzRRrdb-HwT_k987oW=4yF1FCbDF17zkaE2Vg@mail.gmail.com> <AAEA003A-58DB-4FEE-81B2-BBFE9BBB2A37@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <AAEA003A-58DB-4FEE-81B2-BBFE9BBB2A37@rfc1035.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:30:10 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SwA+HM4u5-xpUxQXPH8G8k7sfm6AETJJ019HE=bsq+OXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Cc: add@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f7edde058e60bce3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/GDCwvfBu0hwZi11cppIHUcg8rvA>
Subject: Re: [Add] meeting hum: should the IETF take up this work?
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 22:30:25 -0000

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 3:25 PM Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:

>
>
> > On 23 Jul 2019, at 23:09, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Mozilla's presentation accurately stated that DNS is no longer an
> effective control surface.
>
> That statement will come as news to those in the multi-million (billion?)
> dollar business of using DNS...
>

I think that's a fine position to hold. If adoption of DoH is harmful along
the lines you describe, it won't succeed. I don't think the IETF has a role
in deciding that preemptively, though.

thanks,
Rob