IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] Relaxed validation and delegated IPv6 prefixes (Was: New Version Notification for draft-schwartz-add-ddr-forwarders-00.txt)

Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> Wed, 13 October 2021 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <bemasc@google.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DED3A0B5E for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -18.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.499, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EIIbXK-bzVxG for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92f.google.com (mail-ua1-x92f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 260DB3A0B56 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92f.google.com with SMTP id h4so5308641uaw.1 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=90fvK2EC6D7X2LHDMZVKEEK4k2L0NEa4ATsP3+WXS9s=; b=TxybjLUjPByLQdmh2UWhAGDbH51GlCoJ+XVtpNEmHqknEve6ze7CWRm/YLpeEMVD4c p2KT+rFZfnGdxr89NQO8hhcr1iz7UigD2h0I1UhsLxK1mCP5NgR+o+m2rq+xaAHqkvgP gssdz/SlejwcqmmIJqpAx3xoIvSqKvJ9vfExRcMcr433uw+M8miJLlP8bLOXRo/KGUgT y2XwnftJI7zbKycL+y8Dza+yKB4vW+d2SKRFBXoB6iws/4QghIIABMrAOMtRdnGfZL4S wg4qRMVId38lO1W9J0AEil7oznjZwBfja5IfhuUVh0L5GTPXV7aEpT5P8i1BlHu3+j+1 gVGQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=90fvK2EC6D7X2LHDMZVKEEK4k2L0NEa4ATsP3+WXS9s=; b=nIyFMT/CcFwe3K3x5ULEvcn09tfDL9ZEHKPKumnTtsFnnem1DvC9PMAsvVbtbEKS0C mRuQGV7399CmGNW837gpMt0uYLry6ZilszxHAJJXOEm3tXyjJKemCcPY4CoGKpiXw0IG J/At6Qb3E0TPd0oQMtlp4CMuQIoKvtrKvgdh5l6fUKOYXWjUr72k8uwBRMndPfuGEOWl eCzKzupmofY7ekKjBKjiz0XbfT/OZAdwnkrH7Y0BerkUB9/Mg+ewC1TFjWbwRcpP7Ixj Bp0wxpe07FPV22nCHE7Ty0eZcUC/KUjppv5WVgmwX8YYOvubdyD3cKVZCwy7EIaw5jIM T0zQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ZHdNI1NplkwWpIxOp1B5WR0k7MVpjyP54eBYHJnfIQpXm0deL EGbv2nw5XK/nNQuKnxZ0Q1KZJRq6GhWBKdZCJvG6rQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzPl1gKN1CZQQjC4v5Ign3h/pb30XJumhjkx93HST68OwVvo58JCuLlfgvp4ItBW95XdV+QHhtEWwuE6oPe1WA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:3f0f:: with SMTP id k15mr66351vsv.10.1634138819609; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DM6PR02MB6924A3C8D43C001C78994B01C3B19@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CAHbrMsBQBu8fTeeHtvO=YCn_Af-PzZvHmZK=ErXEAf6U44VZjw@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR02MB69240376B633BFCB7AC7F667C3B59@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR02MB69240376B633BFCB7AC7F667C3B59@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
From: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 11:26:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbrMsD5_FdOrRT3N4Obg43XyqjFvAx3AHZGRWYwQObjtbZcXw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
Cc: ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="000000000000e1f4cc05ce3d9792"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/JplHbFrvLSTBVAbIvHkCNS0vggE>
Subject: Re: [Add] Relaxed validation and delegated IPv6 prefixes (Was: New Version Notification for draft-schwartz-add-ddr-forwarders-00.txt)
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:27:06 -0000

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 9:09 AM STARK, BARBARA H <bs7652@att.com> wrote:

>
>
> *From:* Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
>
> In DDR, the Encrypted Resolver must hold a certificate that covers the IP
> address of the Unencrypted Resolver unless the resolvers have the same IP.
> Thus, if the gateway uses a public IP address, and is actually a forwarder,
> then the upstream resolver must return a certificate that covers the
> gateway's IP address.
>
>
>
> <bhs2> Oh good! So by “covers”, do you think it would be acceptable to
> have the certificate contain the IPv6 prefixes AT&T uses to delegate
> prefixes to wireline customers? Like 2600:1700::/28 and 2602:300::/24?
>

In principle, yes.  X.509 doesn't seem to support IP ranges (or IP
wildcards) in subjectAltName, but I think someone could write a draft to
enable that.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email