IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] [Ext] Updated charter proposal for ADD

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 15 January 2020 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC319120839 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 08:18:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U9PzDy65s7K3 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 08:18:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72b.google.com (mail-qk1-x72b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19F2112085B for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 08:18:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72b.google.com with SMTP id t129so16133778qke.10 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 08:18:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=1iOxFOoGAwLKYR7a0WgdLitoTfbTOwT3h5wbL2vg/VI=; b=fSpQRbd1cJSrh5+F34B2dquEwpFu6GEWFE/LLPeDZT0IQMxkLjrOBY8xqp5UuNaECl fSkGidj2jkz5BYWDAgwGtNRPVLvgufo2F9BtyxAALxw9kmpkgJ5RmIyl/VyUlugJ43VG pMm0RQYOLOxfQc09wSx7cGAJZWdn7/EsKPAv4HOplCUPuTnXSmYMUqNGy8v+I7oP16h2 /LtqU/ixEbAChxz1FS9SeL/7+SQRz1VgRZdQ7bqSMSfa0IUp2oIJa/7/mZq3zPuFhvC0 mTM8XPUwyROZjbqDHzvCDHIQyG3EdXgFM0pK2gqihgw+cAr27KRMoa1CBp16sC0Tps2x +ttw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=1iOxFOoGAwLKYR7a0WgdLitoTfbTOwT3h5wbL2vg/VI=; b=kqGabYrWQ3D8losVWleqVVL8M2tdeQq/M47Hp8L8a1dJWbPD9OG//Q/3oQa1hHMSBD 64FK5JxqDJxe2QXTmi0ugPiMK7P7Fekz2Zt2VLJ2o1U2bKXU63k0fsusqmSuvGaFeyt3 qF+8F1nwdr22HqQAOZ3EkyNV8ALviW369hDl3H8bo0H1H8BtgbCeoFsMUKBNJDco55F2 jUt/4oItUObDeM3d+YuIlpJTguoUSGFCfASsbu/JryeqGyIaKopRw2UZTXueg0So39kJ CfM0bnkgU6XaqcUYHFqq9BwuE8iYJJqj23Mkn5xX82lbIbRN5l/4wBMQ2a725oESlWmB cTNg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU6s+tXST5Y+vvzqUqBQUVEurMm3inw5iM2v+drFMqzvLySYAyg QRRIgbCu43Ylkfw79/ATTvWpvKIIswGfHg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzx7IqmaNB6M2t0q9ZsLlT+SOS0vmPU9A7+/6fzDRSBhlrT9skCciHzzAU++uCVUjvZZd2uUw==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:c244:: with SMTP id j4mr26633680qkm.433.1579105127229; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 08:18:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18b:300:36ee:e407:5057:2d90:873e? ([2601:18b:300:36ee:e407:5057:2d90:873e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c13sm8624524qko.87.2020.01.15.08.18.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 08:18:46 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.4\))
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <24095.13730.124469.943932@gro.dd.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 11:18:43 -0500
Cc: ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <87B74D88-8991-4F16-8AF6-8435BDB60AB1@fugue.com>
References: <236B0A34-8C7F-49D2-8075-5AF5AC35BDFB@apple.com> <AD6E599F-96E8-44FC-8A05-8BFD2F659129@icann.org> <66C24EE6-5C7B-4788-AE26-06B900915010@fugue.com> <24095.13730.124469.943932@gro.dd.org>
To: Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/STzgaoeZBr09YijuO1nZHDEBY_A>
Subject: Re: [Add] [Ext] Updated charter proposal for ADD
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:18:55 -0000

On Jan 15, 2020, at 10:54 AM, Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org> wrote:
> That's where I am on this.  I like the proposal as a whole and just
> think this little bit on the security properties needs tweaking.  I've
> got to run at the moment though and apologize for not having a
> concrete proposal for the tweak.

In case it’s not obvious, this is what I was proposing for a tweak:

Any specification must include a clear and thorough discussion of the privacy and security implications of using the method or methods it describes.  Methods where a mechanism that cannot be cryptographically validated for integrity or which do not provide a cryptographically validatable trust establishment mechanism will clearly describe the use case(s) in which such an override is thought to be needed, should have a clear applicability statement limiting the scope of the specification to those use case(s), and should clearly describe the risks and benefits of such a choice.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email