Re: [Add] fixing coffee shop brokenness with DoH

Bret Jordan <jordan.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 24 July 2019 02:16 UTC

Return-Path: <jordan.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 215B11209CA for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 19:16:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o5F3efaf0BWU for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 19:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x729.google.com (mail-qk1-x729.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::729]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9F231209C3 for <add@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 19:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x729.google.com with SMTP id 201so32656026qkm.9 for <add@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 19:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=DYeJPoYnY0/TU505FOjX7OFd+FeZfCWj0ePMZh/TOV0=; b=fTYNmzNgIRnmYKkUdr9a/nkzjxypqjgkGxX+5sUPyLJzgtAQutoNqCH7K64TrhBIlD Cd0TScEzKBShWjT+XsyjQCBhJge7heM0M5gXMv5CdQRbzufMTzTU9xWoA+G1olAT6w/q Pou92Wf/OzfdyCXExwH2Bm+G+Nh1mxjgn80BgOTCPlyiN/8WrT4piRlhhKCR54cGxKsv R9XPisS/62O95K5bbwPRJt6aS8c+MK7PMblm4X2P0YC1SIQGuyQ/288b5RBKBrathL2q zq+rQc2/tI2QmcvA/dJc47AfaSDXrgGs3WArzGwOb1uHV/H95kmcTbHYNB4rqDOA7sH4 Fw5g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=DYeJPoYnY0/TU505FOjX7OFd+FeZfCWj0ePMZh/TOV0=; b=sn88D3M3DIAaMwe8OAI+s6Yi1CwN+H4ZCW5dYVXq9p56bLwAxTxYspDXGI27wrZZTA Z8kmICmptu6kjY9SDTjM9N3cEF2qIjNBRFfZbSsKSWmR1q9lEyrHxZZDRwp8xUbx4ehE aYCUEFyAMn8uY4oZ+YRiF/X5AEha4V0PtI9R/0faWdJYrAnmU8KkUqLGbviuhzlTa551 RkORLRo53DcY1pkeKqyR3z++I5DW9wTRPAkcV+d3S9mO9LdqgnZZGIz6dUlI8QhLYz7u XbkZt3fs37BTYwrXnRg/ps7/p0EVbBNe2Dj2oJNcvETogtZf2AG2sMsUeT0yF91EH9r8 DkWA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVImehYL0OFSh6tf3Qsq48FTrzxr9RrQooFhQRphLfB4S8//Vj/ KczeLneESrt202hUXHqPYYw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxtYLs8rSR/LOHRmHtlwqC4Dn0C/Ha0J69fGeduViyfi8cmZHZslND+L1oVcJjUZ99GyQgmYA==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:9a4a:: with SMTP id c71mr19779730qke.258.1563934592018; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 19:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.3.66] ([216.113.24.76]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f22sm18306843qkk.45.2019.07.23.19.16.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 19:16:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bret Jordan <jordan.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <9E8BD2C4-D750-4B8C-BA34-AC4425F2951D@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3BD6603E-4C01-44BF-9F6C-ACA0D777BAB1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 22:16:28 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SzvUZS4Ru_SttiZgWtjwBuLrzc_fdewq9w-Ts+Rq_oNHw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>, "add@ietf.org" <add@ietf.org>
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
References: <CAChr6Sx9TEt6CMzRRrdb-HwT_k987oW=4yF1FCbDF17zkaE2Vg@mail.gmail.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E23910C@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <14DF8769-A817-4C06-9140-80198518244F@akamai.com> <CAChr6SzH1EycAr5n+dK5BQcG=0Zsw66qE=8Rptvq7SEoEvQQ=Q@mail.gmail.com> <E5A0DAE2-A718-41EA-B490-58ABD0F31CF2@rfc1035.com> <CAChr6SzvUZS4Ru_SttiZgWtjwBuLrzc_fdewq9w-Ts+Rq_oNHw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/ghMDtWwQmEWBJ_K2WBEGV6fBGKE>
Subject: Re: [Add] fixing coffee shop brokenness with DoH
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 02:16:35 -0000

Well to use the argument that others have used, why not just use VPN in your coffee shop?


Thanks,
Bret
PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447  F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050
"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg."

> On Jul 23, 2019, at 10:07 PM, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 6:50 PM Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com <mailto:jim@rfc1035.com>> wrote:
> It didn't/doesn't take or need DoH (or DoT) to fix that problem.
> 
> DNS has had 31 years to fix the problem. It's still just unencrypted coffee shop traffic, right?
>  
> Though of course I'm glad we've got DoT and DoH as new weapons in the on-going security arms race.
> 
> That's not clear to me.
>  
> BTW, using DoH or DoT in the above scenario doesn't necessarily make things "secure". It just changes the security landscape by swapping one set of concerns for another. A cynic (or realist) would say they'd just replaced one DNS resolver they probably didn't/shouldn't trust to another that isn't necessarily more trustworthy.
> 
> It does avoid a variety of local attacks.
>  
> Unless DNSSEC validation is used
> 
> Uh, no.
> 
> thanks,
> Rob 
> -- 
> Add mailing list
> Add@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add