Re: [Add] I-D Action: draft-reddy-add-enterprise-split-dns-08.txt

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Fri, 21 January 2022 21:23 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1653A0B6E for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:23:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KrFWjxg2pFBK for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:22:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF7603A0D76 for <add@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:22:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4JgXR16LrqzCP6; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 22:22:53 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1642800173; bh=enobJaYSEIGfAd8XXXpnRG2KBqkAJ375AnvFLDNrA94=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Pq06s1U8yBraj51Sw0Hns0U9egG5wGRaYgihwb7Y3BArSzV+J3nvNQ097mlLK1xU1 tmU8WS8e6XM+Oiejr+o5ADcm8c/siP0wFPdMaf0IDGhP44AYXaj1857eHlFrgERZTV 9vOB7s8ejkv3uJ+lxCq0rOtsTcaNRrbX1LKeKDXs=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sKzNhaJQh5JO; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 22:22:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 22:22:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C33C01F5545; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 16:22:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C291F5544; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 16:22:51 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 16:22:51 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com>
cc: ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAFpG3geerJH+jWEZpZnHJpEFcOr+81WyOFvWoAaHmR6N4jBZyg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4182fe-1e8-ef1-d3e5-75b17da23b9e@nohats.ca>
References: <164273967921.28045.13105308218406662743@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAFpG3geerJH+jWEZpZnHJpEFcOr+81WyOFvWoAaHmR6N4jBZyg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/jsNSj96SVaphO-KdO10zbrkgE_o>
Subject: Re: [Add] I-D Action: draft-reddy-add-enterprise-split-dns-08.txt
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 21:23:04 -0000

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022, tirumal reddy wrote:

> We published -08 version of Split-Horizon DNS Configuration draft
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-reddy-add-enterprise-split-dns-08
> based on WG feedback from IETF 112.
> 
> Key changes are:
> 
>    *  Restricted the scope of the document to split-horizon DNS names that are properly rooted in the global DNS.
>    *  Added new terminology of hybrid resolver/client, authorised split horizon and domain camping
>    *  Added DNSSEC to confirm authority over the split-horizon domains

I am not sure if reducing the scope of split-dns is the way forward. A
lot of split DNS is specifically for internal only domains, so I feel
this document is now going to be very confusing for offering a split-dns
solution without actually offering a split-dns solution.

I had never heard of "domain camping" before, and I wonder what is wrong
with "domain hijacking " and "NXDOMAIN hijacking" as terms ?

If DNSSEC is required for split-dns, then it is also very conceivable
that DNSSEC is used for the internal domains. For IKEv2 split-dns we
offered the option to signal DS/DNSKEY's for the internal view. I don't
think any of the add related drafts offers this option? If I missed it,
please let me know how a client that decides to pick "example.com"
resolving via the internal view of the split, can obtain the required
DS/DNSKEY's of those internal zones ?

Paul