IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] [EXTERNAL] Re: New Version Notification for draft-reddy-add-enterprise-split-dns-01.txt

Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> Thu, 01 April 2021 21:39 UTC

Return-Path: <bemasc@google.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2C33A2479 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 14:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8oLLkIybRbmz for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 14:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 281D63A2475 for <add@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 14:39:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id c8so3107548wrq.11 for <add@ietf.org>; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 14:39:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=P67LiP1pjHauN7hnvHfgOGSBC8C02u/wfs89KOWH2yI=; b=hacJfTVT1RGxeeX5HYm16ssW9WXxUDnrlmOBN0by/0jcq8VXE2SnAGvxLZkcYrPPYY 1OIeSuBE9vqW6o9Lx8PxPMHZjK2Qc1aUbXSsvE7JaSUThRpo41mRVxOi0GeHSNYhnGi9 A5IakNA+OmlkjCqg7/zlSZHfmzSzTy7wSKzNJnuLnnqNp6j+S85MIdlUmopcNWciUPzD YI550njF43Kn9UI6dU5VdKTZhNQmSA1/67Zcfp5ylttpKzsshJ/PKRDZR9ZXkfmsGM3m n3ayxJKoWYguRTPMIIpPwW9Q/D3xvOYUjOSuT24YEUtl6F6c0r6d6qqXIaPzcrzOZyd/ orRg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=P67LiP1pjHauN7hnvHfgOGSBC8C02u/wfs89KOWH2yI=; b=kLqcMFb3AviPuPiuuOnYpqaqrilw/gvXisXJxA84u9vzK/0jrocNatOh5gec+5oZVn xtrSZ5rB8zbvkFQwLyI/15/gEbAE/UcmXcnLZ0U4KTzGrH6Yz2qiriifoMjBAqK3rEfy bB8jPhM36NwLj45deLmtGJxOGdVtjNlWAcfdk27nhFIyAsKz8WvmRMy4PR3wHtbm2HFO dEoTkfPxAgAjgnMjMhJAcmua4vAoN+DXh0jNNgR/iuoB/uLuZK0wWuotL7OK4GRzhVwA sMjHrFIQs7rzVGO7bSIbYgzMsfqC3lUohfoRkJGuRQgUCRDTKsz28ztFlTsbWfXCOn3a i1ow==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530/+iMXyORtlsUbHA2zeimAW3yMCeOGl5YB9dHR9BaLcFubJlMo Jbznao3jyaxycH9SOkM5ENBoKeQRie2CY45bJB3k3w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxnzASp1PO+p5pDT4QfG180YvXQiucNY3AJD9p5YQcLAta4/CYIDA6y/vOqaeqNVzEipiF+mSbLnJ9FW4kXars=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:ee0a:: with SMTP id y10mr11485444wrn.177.1617313162487; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 14:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161544385340.18570.13061001177806683345@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAFpG3geAq9oTEJp+uFQ_vHdATgT9Faza-tJURciO=RheLgLDug@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbrMsCK5BUNzF+8nd722R-BR612mM+3oA6x9RzoT_osHWWRzg@mail.gmail.com> <BFF52DBA-5A64-46E5-B51A-9012EF9E09BD@apple.com> <CAFpG3gcUroKr=BD+pqy7-+D48osdM3wmtEjuVP6V+Gra3BqwFA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbrMsB0zH_0exyZYd2ZaC0NvbLdLCZZqu8o0BcRO=js5K7jeQ@mail.gmail.com> <1094553502.24346.1617306679846@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <CAHbrMsAxaeXjK7yg_VRL0uwQMF8RQH2kiV_Ff8JL103U9OyOHA@mail.gmail.com> <89A6821E-9D06-42D8-BF3E-F75F266EAFC2@nbcuni.com>
In-Reply-To: <89A6821E-9D06-42D8-BF3E-F75F266EAFC2@nbcuni.com>
From: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 17:39:10 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbrMsCvGfRdx20mqm_VEy30_A6RT=sNoet4o+DBKQaB7bAQww@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)" <Glenn.Deen@nbcuni.com>
Cc: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>, ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="0000000000008f7f4d05bef01050"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/krZA9-FSueFa3ykJet8eJwUYZEo>
Subject: Re: [Add] [EXTERNAL] Re: New Version Notification for draft-reddy-add-enterprise-split-dns-01.txt
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 21:39:32 -0000

On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 4:47 PM Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal) <
Glenn.Deen@nbcuni.com> wrote:

> If the network is going to prevent user opt-out it’s fully capable doing
> that regardless of the flag. However if it existed, this flag would permit
> the network to inform user to be aware of what is going on.
>

The network can already do this via free text in a human-readable captive
portal page.

So the flag could actually be seen as helping RFC 8890 as it provides
> information that the user can use in making their choice to use to use the
> particular network.
>

Arguments on the basis of RFC 8890 are not likely to be productive: I
mention it mostly to emphasize that we are unlikely to reach consensus to
adopt this sort of mechanism.

However, on this particular point, I think it's unrealistic to expect that
most users have a meaningful choice of which network to use.  Users largely
have no choice but to submit to whatever restrictions the network demands,
so we should be very careful about what kinds of demands we endorse.

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email