IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] fixing coffee shop brokenness with DoH

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Wed, 24 July 2019 23:40 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB091203C2 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mh8EtPVtyNyk for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A73131202E2 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id h6so6755563iom.7 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=g/amcf2+VWrGHMau7LO5jVrSdhrrEBriEYuruGiUNe4=; b=KEJWuLxmHDRsXJcTHcawZplq5nVAYdL/m2xv8xybIim/mGh/TxLv86xziN0y/4li/L LpY0Y8eaPtyFhEMKNNyXz9FTK6cV7NtC7FfCR4kzoXGQkvRNWIvEh4eLEKm5NlGclr4E oisX7uLr+4pdTOGGXd6fxZmP6SPW/MloKR+A5VjXOoIe56oj14K0txtv2fNpGlUyYAeI WDloBnBIAse1kNgjfADwC3o5b3aES/FiNb5DYV1Fg10w1mksdcJodnNTD7Rjg9U4m2E5 2IgjnUpUdSLSrKN4V+536rFt7/N00J8LZS7DJd0SBzICxWMiZ2/VoV+ovu0+D3e4T7pp Zsew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=g/amcf2+VWrGHMau7LO5jVrSdhrrEBriEYuruGiUNe4=; b=YzpgHqofSFFDOg0pji+bSatebdU4P+sBUcrquPSjN1/fe2Gjp9DndXlrxELq558uke EdE3vVP0C3qWeFgC3kTmZF7O2L/BgHH1UQp7K2j6zSuOkVTQmlCT5jMXRcUtUq6xDIzD x/Z/SjopCrkoUyAxowjOdZegM0gNCRXzULIjX9SvEDTBa/G1qFL1SAh987oh2EAclmo6 orAUxf25D/eMng1aTIEQz6WV5LKtcccJAtxwlHrdKeFuj8xJYlkQ2nup3oVvgOU7DS5b 9QuDFlwfk9DiyUdcTasGVanbum9liRgWGFTjUU1+JRP+MKaHEvD12EV6fChNOKccd8nn pVkw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWRXfKIexsl8RvyMDbgz0senBnUJ5BlJTNK9bipBtYlqE8dS+CG 3LTtg0jGk/rw32DXwkbirmP7XxxcTXwVoMV/kUs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwftHrQS3vtYzEp/LtPNLORyCJpVbpi1D3m63ojDvRa1NdjyZYlYJRyk4o2sTFCSZFpBD+BfArMKIK1TeH30eA=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:6d07:: with SMTP id a7mr14233598iod.254.1564011642798; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6Sx9TEt6CMzRRrdb-HwT_k987oW=4yF1FCbDF17zkaE2Vg@mail.gmail.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E23910C@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <14DF8769-A817-4C06-9140-80198518244F@akamai.com> <CAChr6SzH1EycAr5n+dK5BQcG=0Zsw66qE=8Rptvq7SEoEvQQ=Q@mail.gmail.com> <E5A0DAE2-A718-41EA-B490-58ABD0F31CF2@rfc1035.com> <CAChr6SzvUZS4Ru_SttiZgWtjwBuLrzc_fdewq9w-Ts+Rq_oNHw@mail.gmail.com> <9E8BD2C4-D750-4B8C-BA34-AC4425F2951D@gmail.com> <CAChr6Szo+1x6BnU2XH2A0o7CTQrQhFVPYezR7KQVLw-nWToULg@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR21MB12134C6B57220E1B8BF5C811FAC60@MN2PR21MB1213.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <CABtrr-Ue6rAom3ubJc_tPbn37T8HPGPabzX=CxT9UmiicbUtXQ@mail.gmail.com> <LO2P123MB22569D3F3476B913EDC8F8D69BC60@LO2P123MB2256.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <LO2P123MB22569D3F3476B913EDC8F8D69BC60@LO2P123MB2256.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:40:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SxV1s-6zzLw+W=QO6qZ3RcCDhR+PG0bUP4d_q+9_gOHTA@mail.gmail.com>
To: chris.box@bt.com
Cc: add@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000064cacd058e75d6c5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/sRtKfrLmuXmvPGoZkUJKF7Jiwio>
Subject: Re: [Add] fixing coffee shop brokenness with DoH
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 23:40:46 -0000

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:53 AM <chris.box@bt.com> wrote:

> This is a good point; there are valid reasons why 1.1.1.1 can be the right
> provider for some users. Please allow me to clarify some possible
> misunderstandings.
>
>
>
> I’m not against DoH.
>
> I’m not against privacy and security.
>
> I’m not against user choice.
>
>
>
> These are all valuable things we should strive for. Let’s do it in a way
> that works for everyone, by identifying and documenting best practice.
>

I think the issue is that this request for collaboration can be viewed as a
request to undermine DoH with follow-up RFCs.

I understand that people come to the IETF with many different viewpoints,
so I don't see this disconnect as a problem. But it is worth pointing out,
and trying to understand.

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email