Re: [Add] IESG evaluation of draft-ietf-add-svcb-dns and draft-ietf-add-ddr / draft-ietf-add-dnr

tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com> Sun, 14 August 2022 05:20 UTC

Return-Path: <kondtir@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78AA8C14CE30 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 22:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1PqH0vc5yYLb for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 22:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6898FC1522A3 for <add@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 22:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id z20so4685490ljq.3 for <add@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 22:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=nEthU1UY/zVmLbVd4utyQw6w2SMm1YCy5wULcGR2Kj0=; b=SzDN4AgRGLcjkTTwIgRVlFwmYEDY2oAmpxcuqo4iuRmPrVs2AerVUcnCyRxGDa2jud nFxyZh/A7A1nN3Ug+LAFkCiCl58199WAC7Tg40O2GW9UCYdZanLBSeiFQFKkAU3/bhx6 B/1Me+t3J2UUPfsy1GWxhPR/f+lK6o1zXdBp6W2hzB9MpWNwZyNQ8tGggdK3Fu3DZ3u0 eo9UajfgpOHJR/6AJ0/a8JlOsHy14Ws+ZxKr+TCl1Y72qNitu5lfg/cDRkarVOYNC02q t40DakscNBwtY2recCUWipUL+xQPv9OtmyA1uaFjqKjlsfnvFkPxTKr39shEf2gFzVER Ap2Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=nEthU1UY/zVmLbVd4utyQw6w2SMm1YCy5wULcGR2Kj0=; b=aVYCHiAJmgs+ua2wcA0KfKWn6JFUJILEFi4j1bTHqfVyqCnhS1YGTg0mTJucAfUFPY /BiPBA4DHJBjJNkr57052Y+VHqLx3jZRdjUNTLBfKdNvYjpTtqcMAyxRiAe3gQgUXznw XRYi8i5h3vb9yYJeyelaZFFv6AbY7ynPIvLtdWNLpoOWlls8vCGqhfUW5XZFvvPYKKoF jcXbciU1aJRcOfEozBOOOAhmBE6zcg0YAhCltw98nPwY6jcSAQ431JXXR3v8HdvRjIV2 QMYcjftD4JKfjMzsPD8WjvOidnCfxVWs5RplnXN4l+2RnoWLcog5dDyMnLPuSGFNoQaF XR7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0KVtUqjnof7vFObBDo4OJTvXWC7FYqTT28sNurievbxLa2jTIE dD47XJ0UnwguwLoLe7cfuub9QLSGeVOke7bQEAvwNfEyiU2q3g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7O4Lka/swDRERwA5UulPOAZ02QCgZyTmlY66BiNOBETj53cX3zr4/v4RpJsGska1mHtnHpbVL4mlzDGQbshU4=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:c86:b0:261:8700:2631 with SMTP id bz6-20020a05651c0c8600b0026187002631mr120288ljb.404.1660454451020; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 22:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6D166691-4370-4B58-9F8D-12A757EE81F5@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <6D166691-4370-4B58-9F8D-12A757EE81F5@cisco.com>
From: tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 10:50:39 +0530
Message-ID: <CAFpG3gcJyNLD4Nxwt7E7XmyrMHvFxpN85kpgV2XnGyu2mT4VFw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "add@ietf.org" <add@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b80a4005e62cad09"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/zVCGQ2Jb5TGAIVmc5TA5EeReHFU>
Subject: Re: [Add] IESG evaluation of draft-ietf-add-svcb-dns and draft-ietf-add-ddr / draft-ietf-add-dnr
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 05:20:58 -0000

Hi Eric,

The -13 version of DNR addresses all the comments and is ready for the next
stage.

Cheers,
-Tiru

On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 at 18:01, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> As you may have seen, all the pending DISCUSS points raised during the
> IESG evaluation have been cleared; i.e., the three I-Ds may be sent to the
> RFC editor **as soon as** I have received the ack from DNR and SVCB
> authors[1] that those I-Ds are ready to go (i.e., all applicable changes
> have been made).
>
>
>
> FYI, I am about to take 10 days of vacations so do not expect a prompt
> action of mine. Sorry ;-)
>
>
>
> Regards and enjoy your vacation (if applicable)
>
>
>
> -éric
>
>
>
> [1] Tommy Pauly has already confirmed for DDR-10
>
>
>
> *From: *Add <add-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)"
> <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Date: *Monday, 8 August 2022 at 10:05
> *To: *"add@ietf.org" <add@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *[Add] IESG evaluation of draft-ietf-add-svcb-dns and
> draft-ietf-add-ddr / draft-ietf-add-dnr
>
>
>
> Dear ADD members,
>
>
>
> As you have probably seen by now, draft-ietf-add-svcb-dns is ready to go
> to the RFC editor queue, but as the DDR & DNR I-Ds have a normative
> reference to it and have still a DISCUSS, I prefer to delay the approval of
> the SVCB document until the DDR & DNR can also be approved.
>
>
>
> My reasoning is that **if** a revised DDR / DNR require a change in the
> SVCB, then there is still an opportunity to do minor changes in the SVCB
> document. The probability is low, but the delay is probably harmless[1].
> Happy to change my point of view if the authors and the ADD WG think
> differently.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> -éric
>
>
>
> [1] now, if either DDR or DNR are delayed by more than 3 months, then
> let’s approve the SVCB.
> --
> Add mailing list
> Add@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add
>