Re: [addr-select-dt] draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-02

[Tim Chown <[e-mail]>]

So just a quick update from this morning's presentation.

* On privacy extensions, two people (one was Dave Thaler) made firm statements that policy should only be able to be set with appropriate auth
* On ULAs, Brian Carpenter observed the complexity of use of ULAs between multiple sites
* There were no new issues raised.
* There was agreement we can move to WGLC once the two outstanding issues are sorted.

So I think we should now progress two separate issue threads on the 6man list for privacy and ULAs for 3484-bis, close those and request WGLC on both.

I had confirmation from Ralph that the dhc option would be WGLC'ed in 6man and flagged in dhc for interested people to check the 6man last call.

So we may finally be close to finishing the work :)

Tim

On 27 Mar 2011, at 13:50, Bob Hinden wrote:

> OK, I will assume Tim is the speaker.
> 
> Thanks,
> Bob
> 
> 
> On Mar 27, 2011, at 1:36 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
> 
>> Hi Tim,
>> Great intro slides. If you will be there, I prefer that you present because I will be the minute taker for the 6man meeting.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Suresh
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Tim Chown [mailto:[e-mail]] 
>>> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 12:31 PM
>>> To: Bob Hinden
>>> Cc: Arifumi Matsumoto; Suresh Krishnan; [e-mail]
>>> Subject: Re: [addr-select-dt] draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-02
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> Here's a version of the slides including two slides to 
>>> clarify where all the drafts stand (i.e. we'd like to push 
>>> the 3484-bis and DHCP distribution drafts to WGLC together, 
>>> and the other drafts can expire, with v6ops taking up 
>>> multihoming-wthout-nat66).     Also minor tweaks to the other slides.
>>> 
>>> I am fine to present, but also very happy for Suresh to do so.
>>> 
>>> Tim
>>> 
>>> 
>