Re: [addr-select-dt] next step

Arifumi Matsumoto <arifumi@nttv6.net> Mon, 27 September 2010 02:26 UTC

Return-Path: <arifumi@nttv6.net>
X-Original-To: addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826973A6C21 for <addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:26:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.472
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.472 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.128, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dC8sBvoUIxWB for <addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nttv6.net (mail.nttv6.net [IPv6:2001:fa8::25]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441D03A6A64 for <addr-select-dt@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:fa8:1000::1076:32d5:a2f9:6c9c] ([IPv6:2001:fa8:1000:0:1076:32d5:a2f9:6c9c]) by mail.nttv6.net (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8R2QbAq084036; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:26:37 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from arifumi@nttv6.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Arifumi Matsumoto <arifumi@nttv6.net>
In-Reply-To: <741FF4AA-AC4D-4B6F-9B2A-5EF3CA8C21AE@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:26:37 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5128A58C-D40C-4C28-8C3B-C4F98A1B7270@nttv6.net>
References: <D6CE49D0-6BF0-488E-B4AD-F28BFE2DEE98@nttv6.net> <4C8FC373.5010404@innovationslab.net> <7E55CDE9-7377-4392-AF43-ED57ED6375EF@nttv6.net> <4C921BE4.2060508@innovationslab.net> <741FF4AA-AC4D-4B6F-9B2A-5EF3CA8C21AE@gmail.com>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (mail.nttv6.net [IPv6:2001:fa8::25]); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:26:43 +0900 (JST)
Cc: addr-select-dt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [addr-select-dt] next step
X-BeenThere: addr-select-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPv6 Address Selection Design Team <addr-select-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt>, <mailto:addr-select-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/addr-select-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:addr-select-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:addr-select-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt>, <mailto:addr-select-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 02:26:14 -0000

Bob, Brian,

I'm sorry for replying late.
I'm back after one week off.

Thank you for your suggestion.
I'll soon restructure and change the title so that it 
proposes the updates to the RFC 3484.

On 2010/09/17, at 3:24, Bob Hinden wrote:

> Brian, Arifumi,
> 
>> Or, do you prefer a brand new proposal draft that contains the actual
>>> changes to RFC 3484 ?
>> 
>> How about moving the requirements/considerations discussion to an
>> appendix, change the title, and have the body reflect the revised
>> address selection policies?  This would eliminate the need to ask the WG
>> to adopt another draft.
> 
> I agree that the draft name can stay the same
> 
> However, the title, that is currently:
> 
>  Things To Be Included in RFC 3484 Revision
> 
> needs to be changed to something like:
> 
>  Update to RFC 3484 Default Address Selection for IPv6
> 
> The document itself should include that it is updating RFC 3484.  Unless, the plan is to replace it completely, where it should say obsoleting RFC 3484.
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
> 
> 


--
Arifumi Matsumoto
  NGN System Architecture Project
  NTT Service Integration Laboratories
  E-mail: arifumi@nttv6.net
  TEL +81-422-59-3334 FAX +81-422-59-6364