Re: [addr-select-dt] Proposed default policy table

Aleksi Suhonen <Aleksi.Suhonen@tut.fi> Wed, 14 July 2010 08:05 UTC

Return-Path: <Aleksi.Suhonen@tut.fi>
X-Original-To: addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 147DE3A67CC for <addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:05:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.236
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.236 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.496, BAYES_20=-0.74]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yue8TUee+a1d for <addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gw2.cc.tut.fi (mail-gw2.cc.tut.fi [130.230.160.16]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84AB23A6884 for <addr-select-dt@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 82e6a010-b7c01ae0000009dc-bc-4c3d6fd49b2d
Received: from mail2.tut.fi (mail2.tut.fi [130.230.162.20]) by mail-gw2.cc.tut.fi (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id CA.30.02524.4DF6D3C4; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:05:40 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [130.230.52.51] (halli.atm.tut.fi [130.230.52.51]) by mail2.tut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8144AA7EE3; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:05:40 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4C3D6FD4.3000307@tut.fi>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:05:40 +0000
From: Aleksi Suhonen <Aleksi.Suhonen@tut.fi>
Organization: Tampere University of Technology / Department of Communications Engineering
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100515 Icedove/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: alh-ietf@tndh.net
References: <0f4301cb1ec0$297b4650$7c71d2f0$@com> <4C3A5931.40709@tut.fi> <032f01cb22b9$1b2b7c80$51827580$@net>
In-Reply-To: <032f01cb22b9$1b2b7c80$51827580$@net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQxEjes=
Cc: addr-select-dt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [addr-select-dt] Proposed default policy table
X-BeenThere: addr-select-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Aleksi Suhonen <Aleksi.Suhonen@tut.fi>
List-Id: IPv6 Address Selection Design Team <addr-select-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt>, <mailto:addr-select-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/addr-select-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:addr-select-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:addr-select-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt>, <mailto:addr-select-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:05:50 -0000

On 07/13/10 18:27, Tony Hain wrote:
> I don't believe we are actually deprecating 3ffe::, just operationally
> removing it from use at this time. It was never defined with a specific
> functionality in the stack, so it should not get downgraded unnecessarily.

OK.

> Due to the explicit 2000::/3 not covering it, 3ffe:: will fall into
> 'default', so it does get a lower preference indirectly.

Except that 2000::/3 does cover 3ffe::/16.

> Tony

-- 
	Aleksi Suhonen
	Department of Communications Engineering
	Tampere University of Technology