Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the structure of the IETF
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 21 February 2022 20:01 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A5F3A1012
for <admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 12:01:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_NONE=0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id YRSzfRE8vH6v for <admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 12:01:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49B853A102A
for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 12:01:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19606DD914;
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:01:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (pfs.iad.rg.net [198.180.150.6])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CEAFDD72A;
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:01:40 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220221195826.512AD37BAC2A@ary.qy>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:01:39 -0500
Cc: admin-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3D4601F7-7EA3-4948-A841-EDC039708509@vigilsec.com>
References: <20220221195826.512AD37BAC2A@ary.qy>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/admin-discuss/CzA5W_Sju3s7PhBTCdZUGqRNRe4>
Subject: Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the structure of the IETF
X-BeenThere: admin-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF LLC administrative issues
<admin-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/admin-discuss>,
<mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/admin-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:admin-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/admin-discuss>,
<mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 20:02:02 -0000
> On Feb 21, 2022, at 2:58 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: > > It appears that Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> said: >> Jay: >> >> IANA is missing. The IAB provides oversign, but it does not "own" ot "appoint" any of the resources. The IETF Trust does "own" the IANA IPR >> (i.e., trademark and domain name). > > The IAB provides oversight to 1/3 of IANA, the parameters part. The > Trust does legally own the IPR but has contracts with PTI to do all of > the actual work. I don't think either of these are worth putting in > the picture unless we all get much larger screens. I think that IANA Protocol Parameters should me on the picture, but I do not know how to label the arrows. Russ
- [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the structure … Jay Daley
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Jay Daley
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Colin Perkins
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Jay Daley
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Bob Hinden
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Russ Housley
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… John Levine
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Russ Housley
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Jay Daley
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Jay Daley
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Jay Daley
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Jay Daley
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Jay Daley
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Bob Hinden
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Jay Daley
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Bob Hinden
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Jay Daley
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [admin-discuss] Attempt to diagram the struct… Brian E Carpenter