Re: [admin-discuss] Social interaction and Gather (Was: Results of the IETF 109 post-meeting survey)

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Mon, 07 December 2020 22:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA743A0B97 for <admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:13:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wR1R0LIhSZYQ for <admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:13:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C95D3A0B6D for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:13:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id m13so659422ljo.11 for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 14:13:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+7GLy7nb6tgdPCdJDPRZrz4kY2h3PtmnMF9CI5hxad0=; b=FZMKok8/hB8D6Rkb5YOcJMlvO9+ZyQRXdMnBhqISakX/98rQJ6JHq5fjoCh3NQPDsd PGw3eQivkhC4CFNYYnyTyhbGJCrtcDnmcKBx1JwRd9wKRa2obQIYdReEyfjH7x5jGqHp 3wqg4Pqc6JxRwEUbll4KX/sr1ka0fRQOmMbu7fMtAhR4iH/XFWU0zPZfWktfRYwCJlaK +RCM8tkvFlNNLyZuAAXdKLu3+xBaY0myWC5hMAGeUmTsbHcsZX8pEQ5PlGQIOzR7yFL1 Jj9q3cnAc9jccrtiEglVdtl0dLnm+3Z49R5k6yJKK7YwJPSjwXmrkUy1nBFK29xq459r wnCg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+7GLy7nb6tgdPCdJDPRZrz4kY2h3PtmnMF9CI5hxad0=; b=AhHCGB5BbZWKOzk4sE96jCJAbh6dQdVRV1DM12211dJ01IjLnXum78xtjTaBY8qvmi JaAyHPt6dL7ctOUnL8ZFnNReQfyxvAZYMXEa8B25MpHR5jCNWWTL76WltIqVVP+rfYL8 x0xtbqtxmW3lpn2Rn3PE383nYr7DEUHVIEn1KKUPKxbhYNvJZfkt2wL1bRMXIFAELv7a qiRivWzJFr9GC9FZBiyYj3Pv/91W7Sjglewi3bZmzNHraIWqbFZTgl+env6f2XSEgxV2 X08oocBQ5aLse8zV5i6xiPq3bFPjeOobcs7gRZquSi/AP/IRzjoZ2SPISgDGl//svVn1 c3eg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531T11dSMRWQ9rLCPJiCHYH0kJOVeEZAZPq6lOqMdmY3geH7VBkw tCD+LMQMIoKc3Z+MhnqCZ46ktUSGpDcIso6xuTuN6D3hNm3iYw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwZCsN/VzUT/gRATsaKVAd9Gm9dSpNO8nrS8rt/WrJP3QXlKaAVHGMEJZ1Gsxh6Jj6+xKnallYvIHmtPDnb+GQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b5b3:: with SMTP id f19mr977495ljn.199.1607379203265; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 14:13:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160732332696.27144.18241348989978342266@ietfa.amsl.com> <A55FE78D-42E7-4D12-BE1D-0E5FDCBFAAF2@rfc1035.com> <3CABA182-CF4F-4128-B7EC-F6C1B4E0494C@vigilsec.com> <D3F49699-B44E-4065-BEF4-8D7C24541597@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <D3F49699-B44E-4065-BEF4-8D7C24541597@ietf.org>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 14:12:47 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPbu_U4V1Zu5k9=G-6jZcmKJ5X_TE2i3DVTeLsZZLcHpg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, admin-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006e291105b5e72247"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/admin-discuss/_VXT5ES12fUBpaczkL3fYDGz6ZI>
Subject: Re: [admin-discuss] Social interaction and Gather (Was: Results of the IETF 109 post-meeting survey)
X-BeenThere: admin-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF LLC administrative issues <admin-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/admin-discuss>, <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/admin-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:admin-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/admin-discuss>, <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 22:13:27 -0000

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:52 PM Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote:

> Replying to a couple of messages at once:
>
> On 8/12/2020, at 4:47 AM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>
> I think that the structure of the meeting had a lot to do with it.  With a
> 30 minute break for a meeting that was held in the wee hours in my time
> zone, I used the time for the restroom and getting food and drink.  That
> was a much greater priority to be ready for the next session.  When
> chairing the next session, one needs to get into Meetecho early enough to
> be sure that everything was set up and working.
>
>
> I agree - we’ve heard from many people that the breaks don’t work as
> social interaction time for them.  A specific social interaction session
> was considered but rejected to avoid extending the working day any
> further.  Any ideas around this would be most welcome.
>
> On 8/12/2020, at 3:08 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
>
> I sort of agree with both of you. Specifically, I agree with Lars that
> something used by half of people shouldn't go away. But I also don't think
> that the LLC needs to be in the business of encouraging people to use
> Gather if they don't want to.
>
>
> The role of the LLC/Secretariat/IESG here is more to create a space that
> meets peoples needs, provide the time for people to interact and tell
> people about it.  If we then find people try it and don’t like, we will
> need to rethink this.
>

FWIW, I view 50% participation as success, not failure.

-Ekr


> Jay
>
> --
> Jay Daley
> IETF Executive Director
> jay@ietf.org
>
> --
> admin-discuss mailing list
> admin-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/admin-discuss
>