Re: [admin-discuss] Proposal to cease accepting IPR disclosures by unstructured email

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 17 December 2020 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD003A0E9D for <admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 12:40:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ckwCPu4ui4J3 for <admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 12:40:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B63A43A0E93 for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 12:40:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 0BHKe2Qq021321 for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 20:40:02 GMT
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE93B2203B for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 20:40:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9988F2203A for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 20:40:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.113.187.83]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 0BHKe0dM010463 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 20:40:01 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: admin-discuss@ietf.org
References: <CCFDE8BD-FC28-4E32-8861-06870AAB5AFE@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CCFDE8BD-FC28-4E32-8861-06870AAB5AFE@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 20:40:00 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <059c01d6d4b4$cad02a10$60707e30$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQGZ/cejVSgg2dVgR9fKFxG8oLnsQKp1a9yg
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 87.113.187.83
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25856.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--10.995-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--10.995-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25856.002
X-TMASE-Result: 10--10.994700-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: qsaWi0FWcYvxIbpQ8BhdbPVY7U3NX8Jg+IfriO3cV8Rpifu1ea0XM1Yd tWPLVtpoct0DjTY8/MOpRkmogNpsDtB2UdDuAEiHJBa5/AMngr1+S5m2/8VLmnalGyr7KJMzWpA sy3rrYKmj5oGWn98TMIhDOEO8kanss0V1c5XE5TQMcSDq2FtE7NoJtW3ItLLKIEVurWhHQGa9ZU vDh0+pofwcHxMwtK4kGIHv1Fl9vcIT67rDsxpWfA0QY5VnQyAN9l9p8mNlkgk5yibxcff/stHfJ DwbkrHt28AD3uMZJjHsAYGon00Vq39l9AhhHH2YRRDrDHhyfDf9XDMezlt/vHdvJQJ6HGiUhabV PqufGYG65Tr9JwXBicOou6c+LA78lBBp9Y9KEhw+/X7SCDlbgH2K69afcnwqoA1qZKkyr6Hbm9e j4Axni3dODF00eizbCYyCq3z2KmG31FyZGcEodbxygpRxo469247cdjquF4NigV5T7TqqlyFvpb /SqOCbMDydwFW0h0tfU+UifDctdUT6s/KC0n8enVTWWiNp+v+hhKooH+/fy8eQfu6iwSfsX7VZY 10bJ4MicGqJofvJ16W6Ctebkgpww06jXpUJ/XLH9K2ZqHQWln0tCKdnhB58vqq8s2MNhPAL4KbF 8qbADAzKt8/2P4LV33fj+sMArfOEbaqKQSlAZeQiLZu148yZh5j0QUFvIBs9MU+sh6/lQ/QW+wt rMP9MsP/9PWHvzkY=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/admin-discuss/szfPITQT7fcYiWg6BNvft68PW5A>
Subject: Re: [admin-discuss] Proposal to cease accepting IPR disclosures by unstructured email
X-BeenThere: admin-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF LLC administrative issues <admin-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/admin-discuss>, <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/admin-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:admin-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/admin-discuss>, <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 20:40:08 -0000

Thanks for the heads-up, Jay.

I'm going to ask the obvious question: how many email disclosures do we
receive a year at the moment?

While authors have a responsibility to disclose and so can be channelled
into whatever process we want, I am concerned that we should not miss any
third-party disclosures. In those cases we need to be as accessible as
possible to disclosures since the people doing the disclosures might easily
be put off.

I don't suppose we get many third-party disclosures every year, and maybe
none of them comes via email.

Cheers,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of IETF
Executive Director
Sent: 17 December 2020 20:27
To: IETF Announcement List <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: Proposal to cease accepting IPR disclosures by unstructured email

The IETF Administration LLC is proposing to cease accepting IPR disclosures
by unstructured email and making the existing mechanism of a structured form
the sole mechanism for submitting IPR disclosures.  We are now seeking
feedback on this proposal.

IPR disclosures can currently be submitted by one of three Datatracker forms
[1] [2] [3] or by email.  The forms are highly structured and the IPR
disclosures are stored in a database that can be both browsed [4] and
searched [5] using this structure,  

Email submissions, provided for historical compatibility, often require
significant backend processing and judgement calls from the Secretariat on
what data should be extracted from the email for each field in the database.
The volumes are small, generally only one or two a month, but on occasion
they are tens of pages long with multiple disclosures extracted.
Notwithstanding the low volumes, it is our view that it is inappropriate to
ask the Secretariat to decide what content to include/exclude and how to
represent it, for such a legally sensitive area and that we should not be
processing of IPR disclosures in this way.  Consequently, we propose to
cease accepting IPR disclosure by email.  

If you have any feedback on this proposal, please send it directly to me or
to the admin-discuss list before Friday 8th January 2021.

Any IPR disclosures received by email from now on will not be processed
until a final decision is made on this proposal.  Submitters will be
notified of that so that they can submit by a form if they choose.

[1]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/new-specific/
[2]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/new-generic/
[3]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/new-third-party/
[4]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/
[5]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
exec-director@ietf.org



_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce