Re: [admin-discuss] Proposed ietf.org email address policy
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 10 June 2021 22:48 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A1D3A1DA0 for <admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RksEMNCiplDq for <admin-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:48:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67E543A1DC4 for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2414C300BD7 for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 18:48:34 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id rmIsRdlOOY6k for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 18:48:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3FBB300AE9 for <admin-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 18:48:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 18:48:28 -0400
References: <59562F9B-8DDE-408C-ACCD-BC087FE86E1A@ietf.org>
To: admin-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <59562F9B-8DDE-408C-ACCD-BC087FE86E1A@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <FD163420-DBCF-4DAC-92F3-D28676D9F1F1@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/admin-discuss/xDDb5XyW1kemkUN_Fh0AMudbvaE>
Subject: Re: [admin-discuss] Proposed ietf.org email address policy
X-BeenThere: admin-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF LLC administrative issues <admin-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/admin-discuss>, <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/admin-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:admin-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/admin-discuss>, <mailto:admin-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 22:48:49 -0000
Thank you. I strongly support this policy. Russ > On Jun 10, 2021, at 1:52 PM, IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org> wrote: > > We are proposing a policy regarding the allocation of individual > administrative email addresses in the ietf.org domain. The proposal > was motivated by a few community members that raised the concern that > continued allocation of individual email addresses under ietf.org > could at some point create collisions for IETF mailing lists. > > Historically, the only email addresses created under the ietf.org > domain were for IETF-associated mailing lists, e.g., for working > groups, the IESG, directorates, etc., for aliases for certain roles, > e.g., chair@ietf.org, or for administrative purposes, e.g., > support@ietf.org. This was not the result of following any explicit > allocation policy, it just happened that way. > > This expanded slightly a number of years ago, on an ad hoc basis, and > now a few individuals - all of them IETF LLC employees - have work > email addresses under ietf.org. > > Therefore, the IESG and LLC Board are considering formalizing a policy > concerning ietf.org email addresses: > > * new email addresses for general and administrative roles under > ietf.org must be chosen to avoid conflicts with potential IETF > mailing list names > > * the IESG must be consulted before any new email addresses under > ietf.org are created and will have the sole responsibility for > approving and managing addresses under ietf.org > > * new individual email addresses for LLC personnel will be allocated > under a new staff.ietf.org subdomain, with the LLC being solely > responsible for the approval and management of those addresses > > * existing individual email addresses under ietf.org at the time the > policy goes into effect will continue to receive email, which will > be forwarded to new staff.ietf.org subdomain addresses; and > outbound mail should be preferably be sent from staff.ietf.org > addresses or role-based ietf.org addresses > > We invite the community to send feedback on this proposed policy to > admin-discuss@ietf.org by 24 June 2021. > > Lars Eggert > IETF Chair > > Jason Livingood > Chair, IETF LLC Board > > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list > IETF-Announce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
- Re: [admin-discuss] Proposed ietf.org email addre… Salz, Rich
- [admin-discuss] Proposed ietf.org email address p… IETF Chair
- Re: [admin-discuss] Proposed ietf.org email addre… Fred Baker
- Re: [admin-discuss] Proposed ietf.org email addre… John C Klensin
- Re: [admin-discuss] Proposed ietf.org email addre… Russ Housley
- Re: [admin-discuss] Proposed ietf.org email addre… John Levine
- Re: [admin-discuss] Proposed ietf.org email addre… Bob Hinden
- Re: [admin-discuss] Proposed ietf.org email addre… Adam Roach
- Re: [admin-discuss] Proposed ietf.org email addre… IETF Chair