Re: [Adslmib] Closing the ADSL MIB WG

Dear All,

As you have seen in the previous emails, the ADSLMIB working group is being
closed.

I would like to thank the current AD, Benoit, and the previous ADs Dan and
Bert for all their advice, input and assistance they have given me as WG
chairman.
In addition many thanks to them for all the many reviews they have
performed of the various MIB RFC documents that the WG has developed.

Many thanks to Michael Sneed for all his help and guidance as my
co-Chairman, for a number of years.

To the current editors, Moti, Scott and Markus, thank you for all your
great efforts. I truly encourage you to continue working and to complete
the current VoP MIB and to see it through to an RFC.

I would also like to thank the various previous editors for all their
efforts.

Thank you also to all the working group members who have contributed over
the years.

This working group has always had only a small number of active
participants but to their credit the WG has still managed to produce good
quality MIBs that are currently in use by the industry.

Finally, it has been a real pleasure for me to work with everyone at the
IETF and I look forward to continuing to work with you all, on other WGs.

Best Regards,

Menachem

2013/12/15 Bert Wijnen (IETF) <bertietf@bwijnen.net>

> +1
>
> Bert
>
>
> On 12/15/13 3:30 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I support the decision of the ADs and I would also like to thank to all
>> the WG participants for the good work they have done while I was and AD
>> (and before and after) and to Menachem for his leadership.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Adslmib [mailto:adslmib-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit
>>> Claise
>>> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 5:51 PM
>>> To: adslmib mailing list
>>> Subject: [Adslmib] Closing the ADSL MIB WG
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> We have not seen much activity on the adlsmib mailing list lately: only
>>> a handful of emails in the last 6 months.
>>> There is no even some feedback whenever a new draft version is posted.
>>> It's clear that the critical mass of active participants is below the
>>> threshold to have a WG.
>>>
>>> At this point, it doesn't make sense to keep the WG alive, even if this
>>> WG doesn't meet. In agreement with Joel, we will be closing this WG.
>>> There is only one remaining deliverable on the charter, the Vector of
>>> Profiles document. I will AD sponsor it, when it's ready (2 more
>>> versions are apparently required).
>>> If you have any serious concerns regarding this decision, feel free to
>>> drop a note to Joel Jaeggli and me.
>>>
>>> If further work is needed in this space, the OPS area WG (OPSAWG) is the
>>> next logical place.
>>> Note that the mailing list will remain open for some time.
>>>
>>> I would like to thank Menachem Dodge for chairing the WG, and helping
>>> produce good quality documents.
>>>
>>> Regards, Benoit .
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Adslmib mailing list
>>> Adslmib@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Adslmib mailing list
>> Adslmib@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
> Adslmib mailing list
> Adslmib@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib
>