[Adslmib] AD review of draft-ietf-adslmib-gbond-eth-mib-04.txt
"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Tue, 08 November 2011 14:55 UTC
Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: adslmib@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: adslmib@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 8D67521F8CE4 for <adslmib@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 8 Nov 2011 06:55:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.352
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.352 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.247,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rZhl4H1mMAjs for
<adslmib@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 06:55:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com
(de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id B81E521F8CDF for <adslmib@ietf.org>;
Tue, 8 Nov 2011 06:55:43 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EANpBuU7GmAcF/2dsb2JhbABDqgeBBYF0AQEDEh4KUQEVFQYMDAdXAQQbGp8zhBWcNohKYwSZcYwf
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,477,1315195200"; d="scan'208";a="276522155"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by
de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 08 Nov 2011 09:55:41 -0500
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.14])
by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 08 Nov 2011 09:54:55 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
x-cr-hashedpuzzle: AcIy Az3z A1Sc CEGs DG6z DHLd EBJS EWR1 FNpr GDYh GtQp HAJr
Jk1M J3Il Kb0E K2BD; 1; YQBkAHMAbABtAGkAYgBAAGkAZQB0AGYALgBvAHIAZwA=;
Sosha1_v1; 7; {8FC4BB4B-AC81-4F5C-AA16-DC4EBAA544B5};
ZAByAG8AbQBhAHMAYwBhAEAAYQB2AGEAeQBhAC4AYwBvAG0A;
Tue, 08 Nov 2011 14:55:37 GMT;
QQBEACAAcgBlAHYAaQBlAHcAIABvAGYAIABkAHIAYQBmAHQALQBpAGUAdABmAC0AYQBkAHMAbABtAGkAYgAtAGcAYgBvAG4AZAAtAGUAdABoAC0AbQBpAGIALQAwADQALgB0AHgAdAA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
x-cr-puzzleid: {8FC4BB4B-AC81-4F5C-AA16-DC4EBAA544B5}
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 15:55:37 +0100
Message-ID: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0404E02909@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
thread-topic: AD review of draft-ietf-adslmib-gbond-eth-mib-04.txt
thread-index: AcyeJnmD2elwHemxQsGKVQd5DXQBsA==
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: <adslmib@ietf.org>
Subject: [Adslmib] AD review of draft-ietf-adslmib-gbond-eth-mib-04.txt
X-BeenThere: adslmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: ADSLMIB <adslmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/adslmib>,
<mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/adslmib>
List-Post: <mailto:adslmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib>,
<mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 14:55:44 -0000
Hi,
Please find below the AD review of
draft-ietf-adslmib-gbond-eth-mib-04.txt.
This document is in a good shape, but a new version is needed in order
to clarify and fix some of the issues raised in the review.
The comments below are marked T (Technical) and E (Editorial)
T1. Running smicng in strict mode results in one error and one warning:
C:\bw\smicng\work>smicng gbond-eth.inc
E: f(gbond-eth.mi2), (260,15) Default value for "gBondEthAdminCp" must
be a name and not a number
W: f(gbond-eth.mi2), (1825,20) For "gBondEthTcTypesSupported", syntax is
identical
*** 1 error and 1 warning in parsing
T2. In section 5.2:
The agent SHOULD align the beginning of each interval to a fifteen
minute boundary of a wall clock. Likewise, the beginning of each one
day intervals SHOULD be aligned with the start of a day.
Where does this requirement come from? If the source is another standard
I suggest to provide it. What is the rationale? What happens if this
requirement is not / cannot be met because for example the agent does
not have access to a 'wall clock'?
T3. In the DESCRIPTION clause of gBondEthTcAdminType the following shows
up:
Changing gBondEthTcAdminType is a traffic disruptive
operation and as such SHALL be done when the link is Down.
Attempts to change this object SHALL be rejected if the link
is Up or Initializing.
It would be good to point specifically what object needs to be examined
in order to determine the state of the link (Down, Up or Initializing).
Similar text appears in the DESCRIPTION clause of other MIB objects.
T4. There is no need to specify for individual objects that 'This object
MUST be maintained in a persistent manner.' If a generic declaration was
already made for the whole table. For example for the
gBondEthTcAdminType object in the gBondEthPortConfTable.
T5. Objects in the MIB tables do not respect the naming convention for a
common prefix of the table name and of the objects in the table. The
first such example is gBondEthPortConfTable with gBondEthTcAdminType and
gBondEthAdminCp as columns. There are more. Please check this and make
sure that the recommendations in Annex C of RFC 4181 for the naming of
objects in conceptual tables are being followed.
T6. It would be useful to provide UNIX clauses for the counter objects.
The first example is gBondEthRxErrors, but there are more.
T7. It would be good to explain the semantics of 'fragments' in this
document which is different from what is customary in the IP world,
maybe provide a reference for the definition of the term (from TE-159?)
T8. In the DESCRIPTION clause of gBondEthPortPerf15MinIntervalIndex I
see: 'This object partially maps to the TR-159 attribute
aGroupPerf15MinIntervalNumber'. What does 'partially maps' mean?
E1. The acronym Generic Bonded Sub-layer (GBS) is expanded much later
than the first occurrence.
E2. At some point in time the WG will be shut down, and the reference
[ADSLMIB] will no longer be available. Acknowledging the contributions
of the WG participants is sufficient, no reference is necessary.
E3. The following phrase which appears in the DESCRIPTION clause of
several counts object should be rephrased or at least explained at first
occurrence, as this terminology is not clear for the non-initiated: '
This object is inhibited during Unavailable Seconds (UAS)'
Dan
- [Adslmib] AD review of draft-ietf-adslmib-gbond-e… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Adslmib] AD review of draft-ietf-adslmib-gbo… Edward Beili
- Re: [Adslmib] AD review of draft-ietf-adslmib-gbo… Menachem Dodge
- Re: [Adslmib] AD review of draft-ietf-adslmib-gbo… Edward Beili
- Re: [Adslmib] AD review of draft-ietf-adslmib-gbo… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)