Re: [Adslmib] Closing the ADSL MIB WG
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 17 December 2013 08:43 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: adslmib@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: adslmib@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5DB1AE035 for <adslmib@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 00:43:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.738
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.738 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PMPcYj6lsFiF for <adslmib@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 00:43:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8221AD72A for <adslmib@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 00:43:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13229; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1387269816; x=1388479416; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to; bh=bQwJhbWBqxrBhQ6SXSfyg6KahwBvIwca2o8F4weRrsM=; b=Avz6dM9fmtjXzEH5p0AbvNksqsqC4UODoQZOnP1bS7kNCcBzZsJiwgwX FMIPQaW/Xh6A4PHhZLZbfLMSmdVYPE6BQS8zHifAea3+JjiSlT+6lFF2b lQ9wYldpJwlDh0XAo7ErTrcxyWcwzpZDWTq3QTcJa7IcG2eFh2ZhTnxim Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhMFAGcOsFKQ/khL/2dsb2JhbABZgwo4g1ijY5EzToEeFnSCJQEBAQMBAQEBIEsKBgcECxEEAQEBCRYIAwICCQMCAQIBFR8JCAYBDAYCAQGHeAgNsC2YIRMEjxkGgmiBSASYFoZFi0+DKzs
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,500,1384300800"; d="scan'208,217";a="1737362"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Dec 2013 08:43:35 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.86] (ams-bclaise-8915.cisco.com [10.60.67.86]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rBH8hYhw021616; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 08:43:35 GMT
Message-ID: <52B00EB6.1050907@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:43:34 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: מנחם דודג' <menachemdodge1@gmail.com>, "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, adslmib mailing list <adslmib@ietf.org>
References: <52A8C459.5050103@cisco.com> <52A9DB74.3080903@cisco.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA129EBC9A@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <52ADE4EF.4090208@bwijnen.net> <CAJ2jOhX71NR0b13P-6KGaGAjE6arrXURJSn2r9LNA37fAq4z=Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ2jOhX71NR0b13P-6KGaGAjE6arrXURJSn2r9LNA37fAq4z=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080707040007070802040704"
Subject: Re: [Adslmib] Closing the ADSL MIB WG
X-BeenThere: adslmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: ADSLMIB <adslmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/adslmib>, <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/adslmib/>
List-Post: <mailto:adslmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib>, <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 08:43:40 -0000
Menachem, Very well said. Quality documents: That's something we should all recognize. Regards, Benoit. > Dear All, > As you have seen in the previous emails, the ADSLMIB working group is > being closed. > I would like to thank the current AD, Benoit, and the previous ADs Dan > and Bert for all their advice, input and assistance they have given me > as WG chairman. > In addition many thanks to them for all the many reviews they have > performed of the various MIB RFC documents that the WG has developed. > Many thanks to Michael Sneed for all his help and guidance as my > co-Chairman, for a number of years. > To the current editors, Moti, Scott and Markus, thank you for all your > great efforts. I truly encourage you to continue working and to > complete the current VoP MIB and to see it through to an RFC. > I would also like to thank the various previous editors for all their > efforts. > Thank you also to all the working group members who have contributed > over the years. > This working group has always had only a small number of active > participants but to their credit the WG has still managed to produce > good quality MIBs that are currently in use by the industry. > Finally, it has been a real pleasure for me to work with everyone at > the IETF and I look forward to continuing to work with you all, on > other WGs. > Best Regards, > Menachem > > > 2013/12/15 Bert Wijnen (IETF) <bertietf@bwijnen.net > <mailto:bertietf@bwijnen.net>> > > +1 > > Bert > > > On 12/15/13 3:30 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: > > Hi, > > I support the decision of the ADs and I would also like to > thank to all the WG participants for the good work they have > done while I was and AD (and before and after) and to Menachem > for his leadership. > > Regards, > > Dan > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adslmib [mailto:adslmib-bounces@ietf.org > <mailto:adslmib-bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of Benoit > Claise > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 5:51 PM > To: adslmib mailing list > Subject: [Adslmib] Closing the ADSL MIB WG > > Dear all, > > We have not seen much activity on the adlsmib mailing list > lately: only > a handful of emails in the last 6 months. > There is no even some feedback whenever a new draft > version is posted. > It's clear that the critical mass of active participants > is below the > threshold to have a WG. > > At this point, it doesn't make sense to keep the WG alive, > even if this > WG doesn't meet. In agreement with Joel, we will be > closing this WG. > There is only one remaining deliverable on the charter, > the Vector of > Profiles document. I will AD sponsor it, when it's ready > (2 more > versions are apparently required). > If you have any serious concerns regarding this decision, > feel free to > drop a note to Joel Jaeggli and me. > > If further work is needed in this space, the OPS area WG > (OPSAWG) is the > next logical place. > Note that the mailing list will remain open for some time. > > I would like to thank Menachem Dodge for chairing the WG, > and helping > produce good quality documents. > > Regards, Benoit . > > > _______________________________________________ > Adslmib mailing list > Adslmib@ietf.org <mailto:Adslmib@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib > > _______________________________________________ > Adslmib mailing list > Adslmib@ietf.org <mailto:Adslmib@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib > > _______________________________________________ > Adslmib mailing list > Adslmib@ietf.org <mailto:Adslmib@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib > >
- [Adslmib] Closing the ADSL MIB WG Benoit Claise
- Re: [Adslmib] Closing the ADSL MIB WG Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Adslmib] Closing the ADSL MIB WG Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: [Adslmib] Closing the ADSL MIB WG מנחם דודג'
- Re: [Adslmib] Closing the ADSL MIB WG Benoit Claise