IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON?

Rong Zhang <rzhang.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 04 May 2014 03:06 UTC

Return-Path: <rzhang.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: aeon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aeon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4101A0144 for <aeon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 May 2014 20:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kdDIX-OBFXKu for <aeon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 May 2014 20:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x244.google.com (mail-oa0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::244]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6581A0142 for <aeon@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 May 2014 20:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f68.google.com with SMTP id i7so402555oag.11 for <aeon@ietf.org>; Sat, 03 May 2014 20:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UV4i402kfVsy2wni7xYyVY9vuxkwLuCV824T2ELbz6o=; b=NAorXVYr5bhoEcnhMidhEamdnOCXs7680L9kop0tZ3sHx7QRAGbMpO2Pz5Z1+MzVp2 kVvWF0ivRKxLitbYAFdcSsmFuTgSUUj6waWBzUX3ET6JAXh2qAsMJ3yi5Lh5INQ14jwh 5+pGX1qmhFy/fnX4V51JgxHFdv7Kh9yW3kIZshIpMYikNLXeKX7baEyjrxQNx6p/oPbr ydARJNABCNEEHpp5aLZfwAIa6rEs0zXx0808in44iWfuvWCpZR96IeHiIq+eAc1L+cai +m1Q/VgICcPasB2U0mZwr4b9m3tGOIBl9qsM1VdsX99PtC8Wr6w61mYIhVTeyWCAwep+ Japg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.37.99 with SMTP id x3mr25671151oej.2.1399172766189; Sat, 03 May 2014 20:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.0.108 with HTTP; Sat, 3 May 2014 20:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CF895D52.276D6%eckelcu@cisco.com>
References: <CABYVfymcBzAiNxcS75oMBnX-3t+kSQxd1D-aUeek2dHCKcZm+Q@mail.gmail.com> <CF895D52.276D6%eckelcu@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 11:06:06 +0800
Message-ID: <CABYVfy=P-5iczCLwrqgOZCTq1a2srvrftVngFq_TEbE+jHrNyA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rong Zhang <rzhang.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01176279b54bf804f88a4b0e
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aeon/35DM9q_KhRrYYVQQkuXMmsCzDxI
Cc: "aeon@ietf.org" <aeon@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON?
X-BeenThere: aeon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application Enabled Open Networking \(AEON\)" <aeon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aeon>, <mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aeon/>
List-Post: <mailto:aeon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aeon>, <mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 03:06:11 -0000

Hi Charles,

What I mean is that
draft-eckel-aeon-problem-statement-01 have too many use cases and solutions
related content,

but I see:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-fan-intarea-conet-ps-uc-00.txt quite focus on
problem statement,

so I would like to suggest that we start from second draft about PS, some
of your draft could be merged into that draft.
and then we could have seperate requirement draft( which maybe from AEON
PS), and another gap analsysis draft.

cheers.

Rong Zhang


On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
<eckelcu@cisco.com>wrote;wrote:

>  Hi Rong,
>
>  Sorry for the delay in responding. I am not sure I understand what you
> are asking for here, but perhaps this previous thread will be of help:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aeon/current/msg00033.html
>
>  Cheers,
> Charles
>
>   From: Rong Zhang <rzhang.ietf@gmail.com>
> Date: Sunday, April 27, 2014 at 7:07 AM
> To: "aeon@ietf.org" <aeon@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON?
>
>    Hello all,
>
> I have been observing the comments here, it seems that some operators are
> discussing the current problems about COllaborative NETwork and how current
> 3GPP Rx is not sufficient, and also some requirements and gap analysis.
>
> But for Aeon's case, we haven't seen any operators illustrating how they
> are similarl between COllaborative NETwork and AEON's problem. Can anybody
> from AEON kindly help to elaborate more here?
>
> cheers,
>
> Rong Zhang
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email