IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON?

"Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com> Fri, 02 May 2014 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <eckelcu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: aeon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aeon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28FAF1A6F38 for <aeon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 May 2014 14:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.151
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.151 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W5jWfkRab2sg for <aeon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 May 2014 14:36:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6491A0A7B for <aeon@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2014 14:36:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3739; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1399066605; x=1400276205; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=fdy5hIFAL52aIUgX0uNHgtS6U4LdzPAomsSbdc5zy7c=; b=FfLD9RF6WeIGVqje/HsZViDyYJFxpaGTicHCtiP04bEI8onaMBhAvjNn t/G3Awo5fxPq7C33jrXNiKnQ/y7BqQyhvVQ6Fk/eDXAVcQETxqHVw53KV cj/CRhmDgcXHmVlUio5BNXyr3p2Q0AwfUNpPaGSjdHmLlRL3iIRMZ1AcX k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhUMAOIOZFOtJA2B/2dsb2JhbABZgkJET1iEBcBIgQ8WdIIlAQEBBIEJAgEIBAoDAwECKAchERQJCAIEARIJiCQDEQ3DcQ2GRBeMO4FGAQE+GIQ5BJc+gXKNFIVbgzRtgQk5
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,974,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217";a="322061108"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 May 2014 21:36:44 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s42LaiDh001489 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 2 May 2014 21:36:44 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.148]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 2 May 2014 16:36:44 -0500
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: Rong Zhang <rzhang.ietf@gmail.com>, "aeon@ietf.org" <aeon@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON?
Thread-Index: AQHPYiIfSItL6wB6l0mtXnh0e1H/d5stt2sA
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 21:36:43 +0000
Message-ID: <CF895D52.276D6%eckelcu@cisco.com>
References: <CABYVfymcBzAiNxcS75oMBnX-3t+kSQxd1D-aUeek2dHCKcZm+Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABYVfymcBzAiNxcS75oMBnX-3t+kSQxd1D-aUeek2dHCKcZm+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [10.154.176.77]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CF895D52276D6eckelcuciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aeon/51eZjjf2PipIAW2t8LAw_zx8xxs
Subject: Re: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON?
X-BeenThere: aeon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application Enabled Open Networking \(AEON\)" <aeon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aeon>, <mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aeon/>
List-Post: <mailto:aeon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aeon>, <mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 21:36:49 -0000

Hi Rong,

Sorry for the delay in responding. I am not sure I understand what you are asking for here, but perhaps this previous thread will be of help:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aeon/current/msg00033.html

Cheers,
Charles

From: Rong Zhang <rzhang.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:rzhang.ietf@gmail.com>>
Date: Sunday, April 27, 2014 at 7:07 AM
To: "aeon@ietf.org<mailto:aeon@ietf.org>" <aeon@ietf.org<mailto:aeon@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON?

Hello all,

I have been observing the comments here, it seems that some operators are discussing the current problems about COllaborative NETwork and how current 3GPP Rx is not sufficient, and also some requirements and gap analysis.

But for Aeon's case, we haven't seen any operators illustrating how they are similarl between COllaborative NETwork and AEON's problem. Can anybody from AEON kindly help to elaborate more here?

cheers,

Rong Zhang

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email