[Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON?
Rong Zhang <rzhang.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 27 April 2014 14:08 UTC
Return-Path: <rzhang.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: aeon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aeon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD861A0564 for <aeon@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sun, 27 Apr 2014 07:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P2XrRbVECBvK for
<aeon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 07:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x234.google.com (mail-oa0-x234.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
7225C1A04F8 for <aeon@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 07:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id l6so6201139oag.11 for
<aeon@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 07:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=kxZkTHAJg+gvaTi79nmNIwWaeziazCSuWLkBBToBSys=;
b=0nMfKfozkW1SjdI8LmN4faFXDHAiD2GpOkWJ1BvuCJxQF3TX8nFRG3HfGeH5ak4fRd
lqqEmLSTyvc4N7Kcbj5FUPNACLEWSvh+IorfO0M64JurSH7bjiaJEpOkfykeaMwQTwzM
48hGDviLpz3I2Hxc1VvtvyxZr+7Qygkz4O6KlEwBHdjIR0Uwt/ZwZHl86HNs2tbBe6VE
jpdFVgs+E56H0ohHWz10FV1Q87oB6tDgF8SZZmDozpUO89YaU0Lm48K/Ln3pxH3Kb68y
t4jC0hegutNikTxyyJODw2BaDj87ERZkFosHALRmNrB6dddASY/gvJDgDGpl59xl5QAw k1Hg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.33.131 with SMTP id r3mr13357679obi.40.1398607679060;
Sun, 27 Apr 2014 07:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.0.108 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 07:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 22:07:58 +0800
Message-ID: <CABYVfymcBzAiNxcS75oMBnX-3t+kSQxd1D-aUeek2dHCKcZm+Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rong Zhang <rzhang.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "aeon@ietf.org" <aeon@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2d26ce400fd04f806b922
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aeon/5qGVXVvdwmuPHp3uwA01HadP9j4
Subject: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON?
X-BeenThere: aeon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application Enabled Open Networking \(AEON\)" <aeon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aeon>,
<mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aeon/>
List-Post: <mailto:aeon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aeon>,
<mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 14:08:01 -0000
Hello all, I have been observing the comments here, it seems that some operators are discussing the current problems about COllaborative NETwork and how current 3GPP Rx is not sufficient, and also some requirements and gap analysis. But for Aeon's case, we haven't seen any operators illustrating how they are similarl between COllaborative NETwork and AEON's problem. Can anybody from AEON kindly help to elaborate more here? cheers, Rong Zhang
- [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON? Rong Zhang
- Re: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON? Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON? Rong Zhang
- Re: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON? Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON? Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON? Rong Zhang
- Re: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON? Rong Zhang
- Re: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON? Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)