[Aeon] One question regarding the "Scavenger class"
"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Tue, 13 May 2014 16:12 UTC
Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: aeon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aeon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8051A0087
for <aeon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 May 2014 09:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.151
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.151 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id QsGlUpym0sMw for <aeon@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 13 May 2014 09:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huecha.unizar.es (huecha.unizar.es [155.210.1.51])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C2A1A0135
for <aeon@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 May 2014 09:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es [155.210.158.17])
by huecha.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id s4DGAmfp017834;
Tue, 13 May 2014 18:10:49 +0200
From: "Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: <eckelcu@cisco.com>, <tireddy@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 18:11:03 +0200
Message-ID: <00ce01cf6ec5$f0ccccc0$d2666640$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00CF_01CF6ED6.B4568720"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac9uxSPiI7SYpatcQFqjS1KFc69HDw==
Content-Language: es
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aeon/BgS72IgGQK6YeYiJrMiK-W2digs
Cc: aeon@ietf.org
Subject: [Aeon] One question regarding the "Scavenger class"
X-BeenThere: aeon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application Enabled Open Networking \(AEON\)" <aeon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aeon>,
<mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aeon/>
List-Post: <mailto:aeon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aeon>,
<mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 16:12:14 -0000
Hi, I have been reading draft-eckel-aeon-use-cases-01, and I was wondering: is "Scavenger class" the same as "Less than best effort" traffic, as defined in [1]?: "The usual definition of the LBE service is the following: in the event of congestion, all LBE traffic must be discarded before any BE packet is dropped." Jose [1] Y. Hayel, D. Ros and B. Tuffin, "Less-than-Best-Effort Services: Pricing and Scheduling", IEEE Proc. of INFOCOM, 2004 (http://www.irisa.fr/dionysos/pages_perso/tuffin/Publis/scheduling_infocom.p df)
- [Aeon] One question regarding the "Scavenger clas… Jose Saldana
- Re: [Aeon] One question regarding the "Scavenger … Paul E. Jones