IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Aeon] ***SPAM*** 5.539 (5) Re: fan-intarea-conet-ps-uc

"Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com> Wed, 23 April 2014 08:11 UTC

Return-Path: <tireddy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: aeon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aeon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1331A0137 for <aeon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 01:11:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.984
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.984 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CN_BODY_35=0.339, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5mncHhaEyXOg for <aeon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 01:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C991A012B for <aeon@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 01:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2666; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1398240656; x=1399450256; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=+vt4Dzl7pOiS8rbvJCvEAPKuyOow9w6L/ci6mxU6Nko=; b=e/G+Rd815NB6w3uT+riY8vJg5g7EOS2cQgocxLBWQLkOmLZFJ65Tqyky 7Y0Y2VHILQ181DWHu11XoJm2jFpyzjVDGV/fQTb1EOMy54VHocx6XDm4m XF1X5YTtedEt4puhR/CpKoqwDUmF0q170yUJA4mmZvZa9gNTRuMghvnwC 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkUFADZ0V1OtJA2I/2dsb2JhbABZgwZPV4MPuWmHOhl+FnSCJQEBAQQBAQExOgsMBAIBBgIRBAEBBQYdBQICJQsUCQgBAQQBDQUIE4gmDY9jnBUIoy4TBIEljQIWGwcGgmU5gRUBA6tKgzGCKw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,910,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="38004974"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Apr 2014 08:10:56 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s3N8AuDs022808 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:10:56 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.104]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 03:10:55 -0500
From: "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>
To: "Fan, Peng" <fanpeng@chinamobile.com>, "'Alper Yegin'" <alper.yegin@yegin.org>, "'Hui Deng'" <denghui02@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Aeon] ***SPAM*** 5.539 (5) Re: fan-intarea-conet-ps-uc
Thread-Index: Ac9eIp5uh+PHVoemRvCBMSJ6T7D6sAAqH1zA
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:10:55 +0000
Message-ID: <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A24319643@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
References: <000001cf5e22$9ef0e480$dcd2ad80$@chinamobile.com>
In-Reply-To: <000001cf5e22$9ef0e480$dcd2ad80$@chinamobile.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.65.65.76]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aeon/DgEe_MmFIexdkNARMZktzv1Kex4
Cc: "aeon@ietf.org" <aeon@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Aeon] ***SPAM*** 5.539 (5) Re: fan-intarea-conet-ps-uc
X-BeenThere: aeon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application Enabled Open Networking \(AEON\)" <aeon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aeon>, <mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aeon/>
List-Post: <mailto:aeon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aeon>, <mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:11:09 -0000

Hi Alper,

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-korhonen-dmm-prefix-properties-03#section-3 is trying to solve the problem you had mentioned for IPv6 and needs support from OS.

-Tiru

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aeon [mailto:aeon-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fan, Peng
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 5:32 PM
> To: 'Alper Yegin'; 'Hui Deng'
> Cc: aeon@ietf.org
> Subject: [Aeon] ***SPAM*** 5.539 (5) Re: fan-intarea-conet-ps-uc
> 
> Hello Alper,
> 
> Thanks a lot for your kind review. For mobile IP, DPI will have this
> problem. But for network based mobility, it may not be that serious issue at
> this moment. We can add this description in our document to clarify it.
> 
> Best regards,
> Peng
> 
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Aeon [mailto:aeon-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Alper Yegin
> 发送时间: 2014年4月22日 19:39
> 收件人: Peng Fan; Hui Deng
> 抄送: aeon@ietf.org
> 主题: [Aeon] fan-intarea-conet-ps-uc
> 
> Hello Peng and Hui,
> 
> I've read your draft. It's a good reading, thank you.
> 
> One of the ways to differentiate the network service provided to individual
> apps is to bind them to distinct IP addresses.
> For example, an app that needs full mobility service can be bound to an IP
> address managed by a Mobile IP Home Agent, whereas other apps can be bound
> to the IP address managed by the on-link default IP gateway.
> 
> This intelligent binding action needs to take place before the app sends its
> first bit of IP traffic. Hence, it's too late for DPI-based solutions to
> help with that.
> 
> This is another shortcoming of the DPI solutions.
> 
> Alper
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aeon mailing list
> Aeon@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aeon
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aeon mailing list
> Aeon@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aeon

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email