Re: [Aeon] A paper about Skype and Vidyo adaptation when network conditions change

"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Mon, 31 March 2014 14:23 UTC

Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: aeon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aeon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2F01A087B for <aeon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 07:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dQvFu5i9cF88 for <aeon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 07:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ortiz.unizar.es (ortiz.unizar.es [155.210.1.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF4E1A0849 for <aeon@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 07:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es [155.210.158.17]) by ortiz.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id s2VENaHK021288; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:23:37 +0200
From: "Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: "'Charles Eckel \(eckelcu\)'" <eckelcu@cisco.com>, <aeon@ietf.org>
References: <008601cf3706$65b3d710$311b8530$@unizar.es> <CF586260.23AC4%eckelcu@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF586260.23AC4%eckelcu@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:23:46 +0200
Message-ID: <013e01cf4cec$d3ad5a60$7b080f20$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_013F_01CF4CFD.97373BD0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQK0zjN82CEjAQuv0bh8J171UN2WFQEYbZ3dmSd5JBA=
Content-Language: es
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aeon/EN8hnuVg2fMOHc8wr_7dsJDMJMs
Subject: Re: [Aeon] A paper about Skype and Vidyo adaptation when network conditions change
X-BeenThere: aeon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application Enabled Open Networking \(AEON\)" <aeon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aeon>, <mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aeon/>
List-Post: <mailto:aeon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aeon>, <mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:23:54 -0000

You are right. The idea is that if the applications do not have to “survive
in a hostile environment” (as the title of the paper says), they will not
need to use these aggressive policies. So let’s share information between
network and applications.
 
Jose
 
De: Charles Eckel (eckelcu) [mailto:eckelcu@cisco.com] 
Enviado el: miércoles, 26 de marzo de 2014 19:02
Para: Jose Saldana; aeon@ietf.org
Asunto: Re: [Aeon] A paper about Skype and Vidyo adaptation when network
conditions change
 
Hi Jose,
 
Thanks for sharing this. It illustrates the capabilities of limitation of
application adaptation in the absence of communication with the network. One
of the primary goals of AEON is to remove the limitations highlighted in the
paper. 
For example, the applications responded to loss by increasing or maintaining
their bandwidth utilization. In some cases, this is appropriate, but in
others it is not. If the loss was due to congestion, sending more may hurt
rather than help. If the network was able to inform the applications of the
congestion, the applications could have taken better corrective action. 
Similarly, the need to send redundant information at the start of the
session could be removed, or at least minimized, in cases in which the
application is able to receive some explicit information from the network.
 
Cheers,
Charles
 
From: Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
Date: Monday, March 3, 2014 at 10:31 AM
To: "aeon@ietf.org" <aeon@ietf.org>
Subject: [Aeon] A paper about Skype and Vidyo adaptation when network
conditions change
 
Hi all,
 
During the discussion today in London we have talked about how applications
are able to self-adapt to network conditions.
 
Perhaps you may find this paper interesting:
http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/860170.pdf
 
We put a bandwidth limitation, additional delay and packet loss between the
two nodes making a video conference and we saw how the applications adapted
their traffic.
 
Best regards,
 
Jose Saldana