IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Aeon] Comments and next step proposal

"Fan, Peng" <fanpeng@chinamobile.com> Sun, 27 April 2014 09:17 UTC

Return-Path: <fanpeng@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: aeon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aeon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC8C71A0786 for <aeon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 02:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.751
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RELAY_IS_221=2.222, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XwlPtkawEsj1 for <aeon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 02:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta.chinamobile.com (cmccmta.chinamobile.com [221.176.64.232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D8B2A1A0785 for <aeon@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 02:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.20.21]) by rmmx-oa_allagent02-12002 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee2535ccaf897a-7097a; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 17:16:40 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee2535ccaf897a-7097a
Received: from adminPC (unknown[125.97.246.52]) by rmsmtp-oa_rmapp03-12003 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee3535ccaf60d6-05827; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 17:16:40 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee3535ccaf60d6-05827
From: "Fan, Peng" <fanpeng@chinamobile.com>
To: "'Linda Dunbar'" <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>, <pierrick.seite@orange.com>, <aeon@ietf.org>
References: <00a301cf5e20$ab403530$01c09f90$@chinamobile.com> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AE3D6C6@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <21425_1398328888_5358CE38_21425_1410_1_81C77F07008CA24F9783A98CFD706F711422ED0D@PEXCVZYM12.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <007a01cf5fb3$bd975530$38c5ff90$@chinamobile.com> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F645CFD20F@dfweml701-chm.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F645CFD20F@dfweml701-chm.china.huawei.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 17:16:52 +0800
Message-ID: <000501cf61f9$6db149c0$4913dd40$@chinamobile.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01CF623C.7BDD3C50"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJqRcUIzr5crArngJEoJBGcTTnlfgJqAedEAaQVDSUDC9AR9gIRaEnDmaYGuwA=
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aeon/QK8ISDwi5tCXy5dhSbE3DTFzgIU
Subject: Re: [Aeon] Comments and next step proposal
X-BeenThere: aeon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application Enabled Open Networking \(AEON\)" <aeon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aeon>, <mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aeon/>
List-Post: <mailto:aeon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aeon>, <mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 09:17:19 -0000

Hi Linda,

 

Thanks for the question. The data packets are not attached with some identifiers. We are thinking that current methods for content based charging are not enough to meet operational needs. That is why we need to have this work discussed and started, and that is also something we need to identify in the gap analysis.

 

Best regards,

Peng

 

From: Linda Dunbar [mailto:linda.dunbar@huawei.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 6:42 AM
To: Fan, Peng; pierrick.seite@orange.com; aeon@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Aeon] Comments and next step proposal

 

Peng, 

 

Questions inserted below: 

 

From: Aeon [mailto:aeon-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fan, Peng

 

Content based charging is already deployed in China. For example, Alibaba has the cooperation with China Mobile and China Unicom for the charge of its traffic.

 

[Linda] is the charging based on total traffic volume? Or is it based on specific applications? Will Alibaba agree to attach some identifier of their specific application to their data packets? 

 

Thanks, 

Linda

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email