Re: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON?
Rong Zhang <rzhang.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 12 May 2014 07:26 UTC
Return-Path: <rzhang.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: aeon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aeon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578D21A0415
for <aeon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 May 2014 00:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id ltpne5AtIPOJ for <aeon@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 12 May 2014 00:26:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22f.google.com (mail-ob0-x22f.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22f])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CEF1A040A
for <aeon@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 May 2014 00:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id wo20so7667024obc.6
for <aeon@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 May 2014 00:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=3dw+HxjVKiZEpvQ9XEOqDv8+GsPZuM5KebvrjUt/Gqg=;
b=aDAAT2Sl0PSImZ7tIB0nzTo9WCb6wef4QJB7/B0sem8Zvh+vtxBJqdMR0AyWZKzG1z
lR72ojcCqqT3A/JxMM4k/ogZNk0VpIjqFYsOh7QLcFEXSsnxsV601EwGQ/WcTVhbKF6s
yf9WEBOSWGp61oQAWBtMHh3hjQQPOdRoQgqR2mg87OdFMMyueNbjQRSEuYyJffpmbFjb
cchdkQPRi1QenRpn6hiSp0tG534EYynoKp18prGY8iNZqvf2/N8d5c1RjN/jBWe7eAf1
5I4rvTvsiDO2fysSiFcscXTgYKAE/WiYAC4PTK5DvC4AerNP91h4rIKTWHKyJY/dGC37
5hwg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.74.234 with SMTP id x10mr30654348obv.1.1399879554965;
Mon, 12 May 2014 00:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.0.109 with HTTP; Mon, 12 May 2014 00:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CF911A2D.27AE8%eckelcu@cisco.com>
References: <CABYVfymcBzAiNxcS75oMBnX-3t+kSQxd1D-aUeek2dHCKcZm+Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CF895D52.276D6%eckelcu@cisco.com>
<CABYVfy=P-5iczCLwrqgOZCTq1a2srvrftVngFq_TEbE+jHrNyA@mail.gmail.com>
<CF911A2D.27AE8%eckelcu@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 15:25:54 +0800
Message-ID: <CABYVfyn-mcHvP0aNJ2ZfyBT3MwJfV=xsF7v5JdKe8SEUtqmokw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rong Zhang <rzhang.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1ede69a25b804f92edb7e
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aeon/ifnqTvb3UW8gsi4q6gePDGxb0LU
Cc: "aeon@ietf.org" <aeon@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON?
X-BeenThere: aeon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application Enabled Open Networking \(AEON\)" <aeon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aeon>,
<mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aeon/>
List-Post: <mailto:aeon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aeon>,
<mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 07:26:03 -0000
Hi Charles, I also recommend the merging the work, here I would suggest to focus on limited use cases. Cheers. Rong Zhang On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) <eckelcu@cisco.com>wrote;wrote: > Hi Rong, > > Thanks for clarifying. There are pros and cons between combining topics > into a single document vs. having several smaller documents. It would be > relatively straightforward to divide the drafts as you suggest, and it > would probably simplify merging information in the AEON and CONET drafts as > well. > > Cheers, > Charles > > From: Rong Zhang <rzhang.ietf@gmail.com> > Date: Saturday, May 3, 2014 at 8:06 PM > To: Charles Eckel <eckelcu@cisco.com> > Cc: "aeon@ietf.org" <aeon@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON? > > Hi Charles, > > What I mean is that > draft-eckel-aeon-problem-statement-01 have too many use cases and > solutions related content, > > but I see: > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-fan-intarea-conet-ps-uc-00.txt quite focus > on problem statement, > > so I would like to suggest that we start from second draft about PS, some > of your draft could be merged into that draft. > and then we could have seperate requirement draft( which maybe from AEON > PS), and another gap analsysis draft. > > cheers. > > Rong Zhang > > > On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) <eckelcu@cisco.com > > wrote: > >> Hi Rong, >> >> Sorry for the delay in responding. I am not sure I understand what you >> are asking for here, but perhaps this previous thread will be of help: >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aeon/current/msg00033.html >> >> Cheers, >> Charles >> >> From: Rong Zhang <rzhang.ietf@gmail.com> >> Date: Sunday, April 27, 2014 at 7:07 AM >> To: "aeon@ietf.org" <aeon@ietf.org> >> Subject: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON? >> >> Hello all, >> >> I have been observing the comments here, it seems that some operators are >> discussing the current problems about COllaborative NETwork and how current >> 3GPP Rx is not sufficient, and also some requirements and gap analysis. >> >> But for Aeon's case, we haven't seen any operators illustrating how they >> are similarl between COllaborative NETwork and AEON's problem. Can anybody >> from AEON kindly help to elaborate more here? >> >> cheers, >> >> Rong Zhang >> >> >
- [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON? Rong Zhang
- Re: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON? Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON? Rong Zhang
- Re: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON? Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON? Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON? Rong Zhang
- Re: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON? Rong Zhang
- Re: [Aeon] COllaborative NETwork vs AEON? Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)