Re: [Aeon] fan-intarea-conet-ps-uc
樊鹏 <fanp08@gmail.com> Tue, 22 April 2014 13:47 UTC
Return-Path: <fanp08@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: aeon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aeon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 5543E1A0442 for <aeon@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 22 Apr 2014 06:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.751
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=1.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4jPEDJn2rWap for
<aeon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 06:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x233.google.com (mail-we0-x233.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
74F4B1A0441 for <aeon@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 06:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id x48so4906794wes.24 for
<aeon@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 06:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=9ZXIl671z/5ri6E1QKqFs0GVDdgB4rvdDW6+95/sCuk=;
b=KHp/hpZF2+/ITSXCV/oXhal2viOz91JcZrxAOa38+HFprpxFTsC2PxgY3WrhFj5frj
6Wv9UENpF8emowO6j0KOHXzNAbm9cVfwvMvFYvoMu3Z3iu4FiNRiE3pO90vQj220s4DN
NAR5T5pnYUbQRHKw+H31OmW5Rnu70RrR8p38RAzN5ugpm9M8KNHLwDbC6QnPUte3a9aq
7h4wSlogyrBkSqBh2PK6f/XeHTL2l3yjnoL7jABTEykW68uLokUn6NiFXR6RAfVYXbpv
kL2t27wBFn6N4uSu+Kjkue8wA2igNPgt3RR6IfmPCy17hVGPczgrMgFviIokKCSAi+ZC aM4w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.203.2 with SMTP id km2mr2449225wjc.72.1398174410609;
Tue, 22 Apr 2014 06:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.233.69 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 06:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 21:46:50 +0800
Message-ID: <CAPFYP6U4y-mNfg27JSZnkEjFW8ig7=nqp=HDzQCT0yNOqZ-svQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?GB2312?B?t67F9A==?= <fanp08@gmail.com>
To: aeon@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b8736ec14190604f7a1d9c0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aeon/uQSs1D2n2c_uu69aYmpw5FZravE
Subject: Re: [Aeon] fan-intarea-conet-ps-uc
X-BeenThere: aeon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application Enabled Open Networking \(AEON\)" <aeon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aeon>,
<mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aeon/>
List-Post: <mailto:aeon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aeon>,
<mailto:aeon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:47:01 -0000
It seems there is problem with my last email. So, send it again. Sorry if you received duplicated emails. 2014-04-22 21:44 GMT+08:00 Fan, Peng <fanpeng@chinamobile.com>om>: > Hello Alper, > > Thanks a lot for your kind review. For mobile IP, DPI will have this > problem. But for network based mobility, it may not be that serious issue > at > this moment. We can add this description in our document to clarify it. > > Best regards, > Peng > > -----Original Message----- > From: Aeon [mailto:aeon-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alper Yegin > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 7:39 PM > To: Peng Fan; Hui Deng > Cc: aeon@ietf.org > Subject: [Aeon] fan-intarea-conet-ps-uc > > Hello Peng and Hui, > > I've read your draft. It's a good reading, thank you. > > One of the ways to differentiate the network service provided to individual > apps is to bind them to distinct IP addresses. > For example, an app that needs full mobility service can be bound to an IP > address managed by a Mobile IP Home Agent, whereas other apps can be bound > to the IP address managed by the on-link default IP gateway. > > This intelligent binding action needs to take place before the app sends > its > first bit of IP traffic. Hence, it's too late for DPI-based solutions to > help with that. > > This is another shortcoming of the DPI solutions. > > Alper > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Aeon mailing list > Aeon@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aeon > > > >