Re: [Aggsrv] Possible agenda bash
"Andrew Biggs (adb)" <adb@cisco.com> Mon, 11 March 2013 19:15 UTC
Return-Path: <adb@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: aggsrv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aggsrv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C0311E8165 for <aggsrv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6UbwzZ9uKYCZ for <aggsrv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:15:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CDF11E8120 for <aggsrv@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:15:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4567; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1363029350; x=1364238950; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=6DmMe0yIIYARFaSJQxCsZYSB0V4wgTI+FkYSuGsyVtU=; b=KBgNOGS77J+Wz4WWXEEgS4lUVbd6+Hb1SkSy87qTH/Li1qwx8SFz+7Q/ xjASp+szWMcMkQGFPFjjXiU79t8GAS+m6p2bY9+kHXcW3UCEVNFoIwidp eo2tnwwa2naz08fX6d2MSnHluL67A/CM6RMvMA/kDVoZBiq1DeJyzCAdC A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFAJAsPlGtJV2a/2dsb2JhbABDhBvAS4FfFnSCKQEBAQICgQsBCAQNBAEBCx05FAkIAgQBEggBiAoMvyiOXSYRAYJfYQOnSoMKgig
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.84,825,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="186272374"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2013 19:15:44 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com [173.36.12.87]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2BJFhhD029252 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:15:43 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.248]) by xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com ([173.36.12.87]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:15:43 -0500
From: "Andrew Biggs (adb)" <adb@cisco.com>
To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, "aggsrv@ietf.org" <aggsrv@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Aggsrv] Possible agenda bash
Thread-Index: AQHOHn62+spt3wIfAUSqvObLzIs4I5ihFceA//+2HIA=
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:15:42 +0000
Message-ID: <4289BE64A83C6C4384EE9245D4644539237DA961@xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <69f1ac25-6d62-4e22-bb3d-aa7ee1ab8772@email.android.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.1.130117
x-originating-ip: [10.21.147.6]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4289BE64A83C6C4384EE9245D4644539237DA961xmbalnx06ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Aggsrv] Possible agenda bash
X-BeenThere: aggsrv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Aggregated Service Discovery \(aggsrv\)" <aggsrv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aggsrv>, <mailto:aggsrv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aggsrv>
List-Post: <mailto:aggsrv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aggsrv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aggsrv>, <mailto:aggsrv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:15:51 -0000
Agree, this is a very good point. Slide 3 of the problem statement slides is intended to introduce that discussion. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/86/slides/slides-86-aggsrv-1.pdf Andrew On 3/11/13 11:40 AM, "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com<mailto:paulej@packetizer.com>> wrote: Pete, Yes, I think it's a valid point. When I read the draft, it reminded me of our dialog on WebFinger. There are clear similarities. Andrew intends to touch on all of these options in his presentation. I intend to talk about how we could use WF. Paul ________________________________ From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com<mailto:presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>> Sent: Mon Mar 11 13:32:45 EDT 2013 To: aggsrv@ietf.org<mailto:aggsrv@ietf.org> Subject: [Aggsrv] Possible agenda bash I should have said more about this earlier: There was *extensive* discussion during our BOF approval call between the IESG and IAB regarding why this BOF was proposing new protocol rather than using existing things (examples given -- whatever their real applicability -- were DNS-SD and DHCP). There's nothing in the current agenda or the presentations that attempt to address this. I think we probably need to deal with this directly. Do folks think it is reasonable to not only be prepared for these questions (with specific attention to why DNS-SD and DHCP are or are not appropriate to this problem area) but also to maybe have a slide mentioning it? pr
- [Aggsrv] Possible agenda bash Pete Resnick
- Re: [Aggsrv] Possible agenda bash Paul E. Jones
- Re: [Aggsrv] Possible agenda bash Andrew Biggs (adb)