Re: [Aggsrv] Possible agenda bash

"Andrew Biggs (adb)" <> Mon, 11 March 2013 19:15 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C0311E8165 for <>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6UbwzZ9uKYCZ for <>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:15:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CDF11E8120 for <>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:15:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=4567; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1363029350; x=1364238950; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=6DmMe0yIIYARFaSJQxCsZYSB0V4wgTI+FkYSuGsyVtU=; b=KBgNOGS77J+Wz4WWXEEgS4lUVbd6+Hb1SkSy87qTH/Li1qwx8SFz+7Q/ xjASp+szWMcMkQGFPFjjXiU79t8GAS+m6p2bY9+kHXcW3UCEVNFoIwidp eo2tnwwa2naz08fX6d2MSnHluL67A/CM6RMvMA/kDVoZBiq1DeJyzCAdC A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.84,825,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="186272374"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2013 19:15:44 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2BJFhhD029252 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:15:43 GMT
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:15:43 -0500
From: "Andrew Biggs (adb)" <>
To: "Paul E. Jones" <>, Pete Resnick <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [Aggsrv] Possible agenda bash
Thread-Index: AQHOHn62+spt3wIfAUSqvObLzIs4I5ihFceA//+2HIA=
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:15:42 +0000
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4289BE64A83C6C4384EE9245D4644539237DA961xmbalnx06ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Aggsrv] Possible agenda bash
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Aggregated Service Discovery \(aggsrv\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:15:51 -0000

Agree, this is a very good point.  Slide 3 of the problem statement slides is intended to introduce that discussion.


On 3/11/13 11:40 AM, "Paul E. Jones" <<>> wrote:


Yes, I think it's a valid point. When I read the draft, it reminded me of our dialog on WebFinger. There are clear similarities.

Andrew intends to touch on all of these options in his presentation. I intend to talk about how we could use WF.


From: Pete Resnick <<>>
Sent: Mon Mar 11 13:32:45 EDT 2013
Subject: [Aggsrv] Possible agenda bash

I should have said more about this earlier:

There was *extensive* discussion during our BOF approval call between
the IESG and IAB regarding why this BOF was proposing new protocol
rather than using existing things (examples given -- whatever their real
applicability -- were DNS-SD and DHCP). There's nothing in the current
agenda or the presentations that attempt to address this. I think we
probably need to deal with this directly. Do folks think it is
reasonable to not only be prepared for these questions (with specific
attention to why DNS-SD and DHCP are or are not appropriate to this
problem area) but also to maybe have a slide mentioning it?