Re: [Aggsrv] Possible agenda bash

"Paul E. Jones" <> Mon, 11 March 2013 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89DFD11E8115 for <>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.264
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.264 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_TAG_BALANCE_HEAD=1.334]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0qI2CmejfwJU for <>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48F711E810E for <>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2BHeCks013462 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:40:12 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=dublin; t=1363023613; bh=GoJy0VlhUb7rBPpqQ1l03mLxa+a8SDpF6ek3iKLfQiw=; h=In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Subject:From: Date:To:Message-ID; b=VvZi6a0bp/NdMV3hB4HT5JJkPU6kbZ5l1ILOFyPdhPnhKHWAYpQ4oH5R3Xo0nnwHz FIJ8r7s3phi8tyZeP6miA9Cl+yqZB7s0TPZsEATaGUSA7jxWq25ONWhFgNI8MTyTIS ynkr1Pi7F1BESTfb4Um/BaMTLUo4fSVZDpGfxQ+0=
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----QVLKPE607YM38O42JHIXBWZ8I6XUJZ"
From: "Paul E. Jones" <>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:40:09 -0400
To: Pete Resnick <>,
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: [Aggsrv] Possible agenda bash
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Aggregated Service Discovery \(aggsrv\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:40:14 -0000


Yes, I think it's a valid point. When I read the draft, it reminded me of our dialog on WebFinger. There are clear similarities.

Andrew intends to touch on all of these options in his presentation. I intend to talk about how we could use WF.


-------- Original Message --------
From: Pete Resnick <>
Sent: Mon Mar 11 13:32:45 EDT 2013
Subject: [Aggsrv] Possible agenda bash

I should have said more about this earlier:

There was *extensive* discussion during our BOF approval call between 
the IESG and IAB regarding why this BOF was proposing new protocol 
rather than using existing things (examples given -- whatever their real 
applicability -- were DNS-SD and DHCP). There's nothing in the current 
agenda or the presentations that attempt to address this. I think we 
probably need to deal with this directly. Do folks think it is 
reasonable to not only be prepared for these questions (with specific 
attention to why DNS-SD and DHCP are or are not appropriate to this 
problem area) but also to maybe have a slide mentioning it?


Pete Resnick<>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478

aggsrv mailing list