Re: [alto] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-09: (with COMMENT)

"Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Tue, 04 December 2018 07:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8294B12D84C; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 23:50:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ke4Jh7FNDbkT; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 23:49:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8294C124408; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 23:49:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 200116b82c66e600c57ba1c909be95c1.dip.versatel-1u1.de ([2001:16b8:2c66:e600:c57b:a1c9:9be:95c1]); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1gU5Sr-0004QR-B9; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 08:49:53 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <154390734507.31639.3492889788647374321.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 08:49:51 +0100
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, vijay.gurbani@nokia.com, draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar@ietf.org, alto@ietf.org, alto-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0A5FBA33-2DD8-4871-A07D-75BBFFD480CF@kuehlewind.net>
References: <154390734507.31639.3492889788647374321.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com>, "Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1543909799;580f7d50;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1gU5Sr-0004QR-B9
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/-9Mcf__lJsvTHlBzLCTZq_xzFF8>
Subject: Re: [alto] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 07:50:06 -0000

Hi Suresh,

see below

> Am 04.12.2018 um 08:09 schrieb Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com>;:
> 
> Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-09: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> * Section 4.2.3. and 4.2.4.
> 
> This document uses addresses from the allocatable global unicast IPv6 space in
> 2000::/3 in the examples. Please use addresses from the 2001:db8::/32
> documentation prefix instead for the examples as per RFC6890.

Thanks. Thats was an oversight. And I believe Adam noted that already as well. I will make sure this gets updated before publication.

Sabine, can you maybe fix this and quickly submit a new version?

> 
> * Section 6
> 
> Any reason this document requires the use of TLS 1.2 instead of TLS 1.3?

That’s a citation from RFC7285. However, effectively I think it only requires TLS and as every other application that uses TLS, alto server and clients are free to implemented the newer version. I guess we could say that explicitly but it does feel like the right doc to do that.

Thanks,
Mirja


> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> alto@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto