IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [alto] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Fri, 17 December 2021 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBAD3A08A8; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 13:35:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wxwCL3746nHe; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 13:35:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48DD23A08A6; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 13:35:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 1BHLYl1u011466 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Dec 2021 16:34:53 -0500
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 13:34:47 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: "Y. Richard Yang" <yang.r.yang@gmail.com>
Cc: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, "draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics@ietf.org>, "alto@ietf.org" <alto@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "alto-chairs@ietf.org" <alto-chairs@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20211217213419.GG11486@mit.edu>
References: <33a6976ed85d4b0fbfa72e6b0cc39269@huawei.com> <20211208234326.GI11486@mit.edu> <CANUuoLrcJtiX-r1_dwoV662YkCMDscOd86T+DjdzwJEQAkuRPg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANUuoLrcJtiX-r1_dwoV662YkCMDscOd86T+DjdzwJEQAkuRPg@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/0HLCbBeyh_M_unvE3EwDtx5IcNg>
Subject: Re: [alto] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:35:09 -0000

Hi Richard,

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 03:52:04PM -0500, Y. Richard Yang wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> 
> Thank you so much for the wonderful review and we have taken a pass of the
> document. One quick question: should we upload a newer version (v21) so
> that you can check the detailed edits using diff or you prefer we post the
> revised text inline in reply?

The new version (v21) would be easier for me; thanks for asking!

-Ben

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status