[alto] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode-03

Stephen Farrell via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 19 May 2022 12:47 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen Farrell via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: alto@ietf.org, draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <165296445923.30321.7907720799116795102@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 05:47:39 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/1OPMa9vAiHMDc1C32mOKw-0v4zI>
Subject: [alto] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode-03

Reviewer: Stephen Farrell
Review result: Ready

This document seems ready to me.

I did have one question - RFC7285 says that servers MUST support one of the
numeric or ordinal cost-modes. It wasn't entirely clear to me whether it's
intended that that remain the case, but I assume it is, so that e.g. it'd be
invalid to have a server that only supports some new "foo" cost mode. If that's
the case, then this draft is fine. If something else was intended then I guess
a bit more text on that would be needed.

[alto] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto… Stephen Farrell via Datatracker
Re: [alto] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-… mohamed.boucadair