Re: [alto] a survey of ALTO

["Y. Richard Yang" <[e-mail]>]

Great idea to use a Google doc for shared collaboration! I am making some
edits to add some more columns...

Richard

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 10:12 PM Shawn Lin <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Jensen, Vijay, Christian, Qiao, and Richard,
>
> Thank you so much for your confirmations and fruitful suggestions!
>
> We created a Google Sheets [1] to collect such information. Please feel
> free to edit or comment on it!
> The current header of this Google Sheets mainly includes
> "Paper/Project/RFC Name", "Cited", "Year", "Extend Standard ALTO or not",
> "How they use ALTO?", "Challenges and Research Opportunities", "Others" and
> "Catagory".
>
> Qiao: Just add NOVA and ORSAP, please see row 124 and 125.
>
> [1]
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dgbVApnyyiIjbSFp49jSIz3XQHMbmme3WXMQfOZVpY0/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Bests,
> Shawn
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 6:22 AM Y. Richard Yang <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Great suggestion, Christian!
>>
>> Qiao: thanks for pointing out the related work. The IWQoS'17 and ICNP'16
>> work are highly related indeed.
>>
>> Shawn: I will be more than happy to review the addition of the table, as
>> Christian suggested. It can be part of the draft, or you can post such a
>> table on the mailing list for discussions, as IETF uses mailing list as one
>> key venue of discussions.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Richard
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:09 PM Qiao Xiang <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Christian,
>>>
>>> Great suggestion! I fully agree. Such a table would be very helpful!
>>>
>>> Shawn: I understand this is not a complete list. Just a reminder that
>>> you should add Kai's IWQoS'17 paper (NOVA) and its previous ICNP'16 poster
>>> paper (ORSAP) in the survey. They are based on the ALTO-PV and ALTO-RSA
>>> drafts.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best
>>> Qiao
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 12:06 PM Christian Esteve Rothenberg <
>>> [e-mail] <chesteve@dca..fee.unicamp.br>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nice work!
>>>>
>>>> In line with Jensen questions, I was going to suggest adding the RFC /
>>>> draft info to the Implementation details, e.g. Network Map, Cost Map,
>>>> Unified Property Map, Path Vector.
>>>> Especially highlighting the proposed extensions would help to identify
>>>> the need to move these extensions forward to become RFC, and/or
>>>> eventually be merged, if / after we realize through a proper Table
>>>> mapping proposed extensions to use case implementations and citations.
>>>> Such a table could also incorporate the additional requirements
>>>> suggested by Jensen and altogether contribute to a potential WG
>>>> recharter.
>>>>
>>>> -ch
>>>> Em seg, 11 de jun de 2018 às 03:32, Jensen Zhang
>>>> <[e-mail]> escreveu:
>>>> >
>>>> > Hi Shawn,
>>>> >
>>>> > Thank you a lot! Also, thank Dawn and Danny. A survey on the current
>>>> ALTO related works is very helpful.
>>>> >
>>>> > I believe your classification for the ALTO use cases is based on the
>>>> role ALTO plays in the existing system. Do we have any summary of the
>>>> requirements? All of them use the standard ALTO without any modification or
>>>> extension? I believe such information is more useful and should be
>>>> considered in the survey. Because we try to understand what are the
>>>> essential additional requirements for newer scenarios. It will decide
>>>> whether we need to recharter the WG.
>>>> >
>>>> > Best,
>>>> > Jensen
>>>> >
>>>> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 1:21 PM Shawn Lin <[e-mail]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Dear ALTOers,
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> @Dawn, @Danny and I are working on a survey of ALTO. Our goal is to
>>>> understand what ALTO can already do in the real system, how others use ALTO
>>>> and the additional requirements for newer applications (like SDN, NFV,
>>>> Block-chain network) to do the traffic optimization.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Currently, we have a deck of slides and a skeleton of our draft. We
>>>> had some wonderful discussions with @Richard and @Sabine! So here we would
>>>> like to share the slides with the WG and get feedback from WG members. I
>>>> believe it is a good way to summarize the current status and look into the
>>>> next step :)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> The current slides include 6 ALTO implementations (from open source
>>>> project, academic research, and company production) and 18 use cases (from
>>>> IETF drafts/slides, papers, and white papers) in 5 categories like below:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> ALTO Use Cases
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   +--> Information Source
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     |
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     +---> Path Selection in MPTS-AR
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     |
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     +---> Locate Content in Mobile Edge Cache
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     |
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     +---> Virtualized Service Function Chain Placement
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     |
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     +---> Intelligent VM Placement
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     |
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     +---> Service Placement in IoT
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   +--> Ranking Server
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     |
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     +---> A Peer Ranking Service for P2P Streaming
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     |     Information
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     +---> A Service to Select CDN Surrogate
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     |
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     +---> A Service to Select CDN Servers from
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     |     Different SDN Domains
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     +---> A Service to Select downstream CDN
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     |
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     +---> A Service to Guide the Peer Connection
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |           in  Blockchain
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   +--> Network Abstraction
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     |
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     +---> Network Abstraction Provider in SDN
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     |
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     +---> Topology Abstraction for VPN Scale-out
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     |     Decisions
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     +---> ALTO being Used to Solving n2  Problem
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |--> Information Exchanger
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     |
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |     +---> Network Behaviors Exchanger between
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |           Providers
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   |
>>>> >>
>>>> >>   +--> Measure Results Interface
>>>> >>
>>>> >>         |
>>>> >>
>>>> >>         +---> An Interface to Query on the LMAP
>>>> >>
>>>> >>               measure results
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> We attach the slides below. You can also access the editable version
>>>> in Google Slides:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1aXIZfUjQrSFhkVIUbvt2ouKWqLgGq4kbG-EBmSaZtKo/edit?usp=sharing
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Any comments or suggestions are welcomed and appreciated!
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Bests,
>>>> >> Shawn Lin
>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> alto mailing list
>>>> >> [e-mail]
>>>> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > alto mailing list
>>>> > [e-mail]
>>>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> alto mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Qiao Xiang
>>> Postdoctoral Fellow,
>>> Department of Computer Science,
>>> Yale University
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> alto mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>>  =====================================
>> | Y. Richard Yang <[e-mail]>   |
>> | Professor of Computer Science       |
>> | http://www.cs.yale.edu/~yry/        |
>>  =====================================
>> _______________________________________________
>> alto mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>>
>

-- 
-- 
 =====================================
| Y. Richard Yang <[e-mail]>   |
| Professor of Computer Science       |
| http://www.cs.yale.edu/~yry/        |
 =====================================