Re: [alto] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-20: (with COMMENT)
"Y. Richard Yang" <yry@cs.yale.edu> Thu, 12 March 2020 15:22 UTC
Return-Path: <yang.r.yang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 602103A0A6C; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 08:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.867
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.867 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001, NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR=1.242, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.463, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 391AbFE9J2H2; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 08:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-f175.google.com (mail-vk1-f175.google.com [209.85.221.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAC733A0A10; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 08:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-f175.google.com with SMTP id b187so1666387vkh.12; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 08:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+ZB921mpxxeAg1L+JUAAlOelVfGKWZOB1zVSTnaZ5w8=; b=SmPMVpeIvH7XyuHiK1K/Uxj/Vo7jlJhVUgycCBJXxehFiEVIL5+Y5HAcbXn8WX2Luz AePLffq/17GTxaBqrF3ogeYzF8O8Wmv70H8tFpyW5eW7MQS2Z1CdSQautbJs6JI5F+8w y4Nb2aQfqIEP8oxuhJF5CmnVkZJTEvJtVbNXb+9Btvr/FJwsUqSMDryFO3829RSPXny7 x8Wit67eea+HXw7E2QGn8uv9uhuk1DQZek2i7ireNIdeJQacZEw55jkY8gxrh9Pw5Vjp SEpR67oikCmDDMsmt7Xe5f4oIvuGGkKKBm3sFGW3B3luPzk+xOsWFxoT178TG8CRAiqf 5xcg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1aKm4itiucsF97cX7r7mdhCylaa4PKjg8xyQY5oYFytUyIV+29 R+OrbE+rQtO4thV00ohNr9tJocLrm7rTVcVN/RY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvZjwMgVXYk1lpyXnFF7ro0RgbOt9Ig3tXXcJA/c0J7a4yesIG8UN8tgyKiE4DNZyxrs9izja+4lLHZYDhlf5g=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:2992:: with SMTP id p140mr1009347vkp.97.1584026520591; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 08:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158398476822.19755.15842999304860496392@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <158398476822.19755.15842999304860496392@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: "Y. Richard Yang" <yry@cs.yale.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:21:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CANUuoLojzH3EfK8hQEKr601n5rAvhP+s04HzFmF_TjH2EpOPQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>, alto@ietf.org, alto-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse@ietf.org, vkg@bell-labs.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000013221605a0a9ea48"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/46QmaWpmOsoQTMRnl0s8j9AId2k>
Subject: Re: [alto] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-20: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 15:22:04 -0000
Dear Adam, Suresh, Mirja, Thanks. The authors now agree and will replace the duplicated pseudo code with a reference. Adam: Thanks for catching the 193.51.100.0 IP address issue. We will replace both cases with a RFC 5737 address. Thanks again! Richard On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:46 PM Adam Roach via Datatracker < noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-20: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for the work on this document. I strongly agree with Suresh’s first > point, regarding the restatement of the merge algorithm. I have one > additional > comment: > > Section 3.1.2.1: > > "ipv4" : [ "192.0.2.0/24", "198.51.100.0/25", > "193.51.100.0/25" ], > > The address "193.51.100.0" is from a block allocated to the University of > Paris. Please change it to an RFC 5737 documentation address. (This occurs > twice in the document) > > > > -- Richard
- [alto] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-al… Adam Roach via Datatracker
- Re: [alto] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-iet… Y. Richard Yang