Re: [alto] Reminder: Agenda requests due by Tue CoB (US time)

Dear Richard, as you saw my previous response, this is TBD.
I will chat with Jan and Martin and send out some guidance on the mailing
list on how to structure the rechartering discussion slot.
Thanks,
- vijay

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 5:47 AM Y. Richard Yang <yry@cs.yale.edu> wrote:

> Hi Vijay, Jan,
>
> A question regarding the one-hour block for the recharter discussions. I
> see three types of slots:
> 1. A talk with a clear focus which may result in one particular chartered
> item (e.g., motivation and initial ideas for adding a specific alto
> extension);
> 2. A more broad-scoped talk which may result in multiple items (e.g.,
> extending alto to cellular networks/coordination with 3gpp on related
> network exposure functions);
> 3. Open mic for broad discussions.
>
> I assume that there will be a type 3 slot which we do not need to request.
>
> Any preference/recommendation on type 1 vs type 2?
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> Richard
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 5:35 PM Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> All: We have not received any agenda requests so far; if you have sent us
>> one, please remind us (and accept our apologies).
>>
>> Please see [1] for agenda request format.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> - vijay
>>
>> [1]
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/QsicOrADB6gqMhNc3hMrPNxXY18/
>> _______________________________________________
>> alto mailing list
>> alto@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>>
> --
> Richard
>