Re: [alto] Normative References in draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12

Hi Jan, Qin,

Please see below.

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 1:43 AM Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi, Jan and authors of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics:
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: alto [mailto:alto-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Jan Seedorf
> 发送时间: 2020年11月12日 6:32
> 收件人: alto@ietf.org
> 主题: [alto] Normative References in draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12
>
> Dear authors of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12,
>
> while reviewing the document, I notices the following issues with
> normative references:
>
> 1)    [I-D.ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp]
>                Previdi, S., Wu, Q., Gredler, H., Ray, S.,
>                jefftant@gmail.com, j., Filsfils, C., and L. Ginsberg,
>                "BGP-LS Advertisement of IGP Traffic Engineering
>                Performance Metric Extensions", draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-
>                bgp-03 (work in progress), May 2016.
>
> --> This is an RFC by now, so please fix the ref
> [Qin]: I think [I-D.ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp] has already been replaced by
> RFC8571 in the v-12 or earlier version.
>

We no longer use this as a reference. So the issue is fixed.

>
> 2)    [I-D.ietf-ippm-initial-registry]
>                Morton, A., Bagnulo, M., Eardley, P., and K. D'Souza,
>                "Initial Performance Metric Registry Entries", draft-ietf-
>                ippm-initial-registry-01 (work in progress), July 2016.
>
> --> this draft is in version -016 by now, and also not a normative
> reference; so please update the ref and move it to informative references
>
[Qin]: Agree, I have checked the reference, I found
> [I-D.ietf-ippm-initial-registry] has been quoted four times but I didn't
> find this reference section 9.1 or section 9.2, I think this issues should
> be fixed.
>

Fixed. Added to informative and it looks to be the latest version -16.

Further note: I fixed the issue of [RFC8571].

> Also IDnits should be fixed as well,
>
> https://www6.ietf.org/tools/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-13.txt
> There are 3 nits errors which should be fixed.
>
> All nits except one nit are fixed. It suggested to add an IPv6 example,
and we already have IPv6 examples (e.g., Example 1). Since we added "ipv6:"
prefix, the tool did not detect such examples.

> Can you please address these issues as well when you address the WGLC
> comments received (see below)?
>
>
Thank you so much!

Richard

> Thanks,
>
> Jan
>
> Am 08.11.20 um 22:56 schrieb Jan Seedorf:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > this ends the WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12. No
> > objections on this document have been raised. Three individual reviews
> > have been done, the respective comments have each been posted on the
> > ALTO mailing list by Kai (Oct 10), Denny (Oct 12), and Jensen (Oct
> > 13). May I kindly ask the authors of the document to address these
> > comments ASAP and post a new version of the document?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jan
> >
> > Am 28.09.20 um 18:42 schrieb Jan Seedorf:
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> as discussed during the ALTO session at IETF-108, we are moving
> >> forward with all the remaining milestones.
> >>
> >> Thus, this email starts a WGLC for
> >> draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12. The WGLC will run two weeks,
> >> so from today, Monday, September 28, until Monday, Oktober 12, 2020.
> >>
> >> We would like to have two individual reviews of this document as part
> >> of the WGLC. Please send us an email if you are willing review the
> >> draft as part of WGLC. We really need these reviews to make progress.
> >>
> >>  - Vijay and Jan
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> alto mailing list
> >> alto@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > alto mailing list
> > alto@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> alto@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto