Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, path-vector

"Y. Richard Yang" <yry@cs.yale.edu> Thu, 12 November 2020 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <yang.r.yang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023A13A1458 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:58:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ndezGFruunKt for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:58:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-f43.google.com (mail-ej1-f43.google.com [209.85.218.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A3003A1472 for <alto@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:58:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-f43.google.com with SMTP id me8so9246997ejb.10 for <alto@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:58:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tD6M3jbZ5xot9E2S9fH0m+JjLyu00xVnGnKRWW/MV18=; b=jAtdrXfo3Ip9oy2KSPa4BF1kK6s3UWsGBs7FCpE+ENx6QzAh/eoWYpOqknL6pi9CHs s7mvduscM2mmh2uBdW/oZMBo6p57ebNxzNOnnXM94oG6r7KmTRCX+hpPvH6ha2GcB8aw BW43xIuuZadcW5yL7VuNUgloJMJD5Rqz7p3zoSzT5nkIHXEj2/RoVVH046nKKjLtqrsg DSSPhWZWTChk1hIOIzAXXgnIGss3j5PCjiVzDw+CecRuakZpJSqXd46WRCfbGykrkH8R B95i0zgXqwvWFHavPprXU6mQ9+QzC1D+McUsD8SwUuktWdbwo2ZCbaNV910OKwHM4QFR uYiw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533givblkwUpDXqXECevE7xoThXahi7r9t7fkgajx0AecXuGn4bz /Mvgk8liMdadand2/R4/SvoQV8k7ZTIF1Tw0LyQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxMtrhJ57l3fnRHmxjI4v4WL8ca8JqqWKAU2kYp7MpqP91HCRgWyh5IHkcpqh2fRu4oCP+yXZ/OpPXAHTw/4Z8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1a1a:: with SMTP id i26mr482808ejf.478.1605203911406; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:58:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMMTW_LAKfPYiD3PFveRAoHe+_WxxU6McRsMzKDVrg5T87j6Yg@mail.gmail.com> <PR3PR07MB70187439187DB78D878381F095E70@PR3PR07MB7018.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <PR3PR07MB70187439187DB78D878381F095E70@PR3PR07MB7018.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: "Y. Richard Yang" <yry@cs.yale.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:58:19 -0500
Message-ID: <CANUuoLqSLLXTnrXRvepDYv3zDtsLYEjKZt1bKDbn_A4-oMy+4g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com>
Cc: IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>, Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ee7faa05b3eca887"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/6heR06J9ZyELuCX0hhA5R8eZrh4>
Subject: Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, path-vector
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:58:39 -0000

Hi Vijay,

- I believe that there was an implementation of unified properties by Wendy
Roome. But it is for an earlier version, not the latest one which we just
posted.

- I understand that there was an implementation of path vector used in
super computing demonstration; but it was for an earlier version of path
vector without the integration of unified properties.

Richard

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:43 PM Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia -
FR/Paris-Saclay) <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com> wrote:

> Hi Vijay,
>
>
>
> To my knowledge,
>
>
>
> - there is no implementation of Unified Properties that reflects the
> latest design updates, defined in 2019 and 2020,
>
> - I am not aware of any implementation of Path Vector.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sabine
>
>
>
> *From:* alto <alto-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Vijay Gurbani
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 11, 2020 5:57 PM
> *To:* IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni,
> path-vector
>
>
>
> All: I am the shepherd for the three drafts identified in the subject.
>
>
>
> As I prepare the shepherd writeup, I will like to document if there are
> any implementations of these three drafts that the WG members are aware
> of.  These implementations can be private (a few individuals working on the
> drafts), or be more formal with a GitHub repository and a larger community.
>
>
>
> If any WG member is aware of implementations, please let me know.  Please
> drop me an email (or  post on the list) with the details as you know them.
> I would like to kindly ask you to do this as soon as possible ---
> preferably by the end of this week --- to allow me to prepare the shepherd
> writeup.
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> - vijay
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> alto@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>
-- 
Richard